Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) vs Walmart Inc. (WMT)
A side-by-side comparison of Constellation Brands, Inc. and Walmart Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
$122.45Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
WMT
Walmart Inc.
$107.15Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — STZ vs WMT
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10ySTZ -13.2% (-1.4%/yr)WMT +420.6% (+17.9%/yr)WMT compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
STZ WMT
STZ vs WMT: by the numbers
- •WMT is the larger company ($852.71B vs $20.91B market cap).
- •STZ trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (11.68 vs 38.68 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •STZ converts more revenue to profit (20.14% vs 3.00% net margin).
- •WMT grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.38% vs 0.86% CAGR).
- •STZ pays the higher dividend yield (3.37% vs 0.92%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | STZ | WMT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 11.68 | 38.68 |
| Forward P/E | 10.38 | 37.07 |
| P/S ratio | 2.31 | 1.16 |
| P/B ratio | 2.53 | 8.68 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.44 | 19.31 |
| FCF yield | 8.77% | 1.58% |
Profitability
| Metric | STZ | WMT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 52.62% | 25.23% |
| Operating margin | 32.14% | 4.39% |
| Net margin | 20.14% | 3.00% |
| ROE | 22.10% | 22.47% |
| ROIC | 10.85% | 12.89% |
Dividends
| Metric | STZ | WMT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.37% | 0.92% |
| Payout ratio | 39.12% | 35.29% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | STZ | WMT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 0.86% | 5.38% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -1.59% | 10.95% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -1.73% | -5.40% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -9.18% | 18.21% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, STZ or WMT?
- STZ has the lower trailing P/E: STZ trades at 11.68 and WMT at 38.68. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, STZ or WMT?
- Over the past five years, WMT grew revenue faster — STZ at a 0.86% CAGR versus WMT at 5.38%.
- Does STZ or WMT pay a bigger dividend?
- STZ yields 3.37% and WMT yields 0.92% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is STZ or WMT more profitable?
- STZ runs the higher net margin — STZ at 20.14% versus WMT at 3.00%.
- How have STZ and WMT total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, STZ delivered -1.27% and WMT delivered 18.23% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Constellation Brands P/E ratioWalmart P/E ratioConstellation Brands dividend yieldWalmart dividend yieldConstellation Brands ROEWalmart ROEConstellation Brands operating marginWalmart operating marginConstellation Brands revenue growthWalmart revenue growthConstellation Brands free cash flowWalmart free cash flow
Constellation Brands & Walmart appear in these rankings
Highest Dividend Yield Stocks25+ Year Dividend GrowersHighest Operating Margin StocksHighest FCF Yield Stocks
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.