Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) vs Walmart Inc. (WMT)
STZ leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Constellation Brands, Inc. and Walmart Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
$148.51Consumer Defensive
WMT
Walmart Inc.
$121.04Consumer Defensive
Not enough overlapping price history to compare STZ and WMT.
STZ vs WMT: by the numbers
- •WMT is the larger company ($963.25B vs $25.47B market cap).
- •STZ trades at the lower earnings multiple (15.49 vs 42.47 P/E).
- •STZ converts more revenue to profit (18.46% vs 3.18% net margin).
- •WMT grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.20% vs 1.19% CAGR).
- •STZ pays the higher dividend yield (2.75% vs 0.80%).
Which is better, STZ or WMT?
Metric tally: STZ 10 · WMT 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSTZ(lower P/E)
GrowthWMT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeSTZ(higher dividend yield)
QualityWMT(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | STZ | WMT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 15.49● | 42.47 |
| Forward P/E | 11.90● | 36.88 |
| P/S ratio | 2.82 | 1.33● |
| P/B ratio | 3.19● | 10.26 |
| PEG ratio | — | 3.29 |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.70● | 23.28 |
| FCF yield | 6.95%● | 1.30% |
Profitability
| Metric | STZ | WMT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 51.67%● | 24.98% |
| Operating margin | 31.33%● | 4.16% |
| Net margin | 18.46%● | 3.18% |
| ROE | 20.87% | 24.44%● |
| ROIC | 10.48% | 11.87%● |
Dividends
| Metric | STZ | WMT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.75%● | 0.80% |
| Payout ratio | 42.52% | 35.22% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | STZ | WMT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 1.19% | 5.20%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -1.59% | 10.95%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -1.57%● | -9.94% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -7.36% | 22.41%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, STZ or WMT?
- It depends on your goal. value: STZ (lower P/E); growth: WMT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: STZ (higher dividend yield); quality: WMT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, STZ leads 10 to 6.
- Is STZ or WMT cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, STZ is cheaper: STZ trades at a 15.49 P/E and WMT at 42.47.
- Which has grown faster, STZ or WMT?
- Over the past five years, WMT grew revenue faster — STZ at a 1.19% CAGR versus WMT at 5.20%.
- Does STZ or WMT pay a bigger dividend?
- STZ yields 2.75% and WMT yields 0.80% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is STZ or WMT more profitable?
- STZ runs the higher net margin — STZ at 18.46% versus WMT at 3.18%.
- Which has been the better investment, STZ or WMT?
- Over the past 10-year, WMT delivered the higher annualized total return — STZ at 1.25% versus WMT at 19.73%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Constellation Brands P/E ratioWalmart P/E ratioConstellation Brands dividend yieldWalmart dividend yieldConstellation Brands ROEWalmart ROEConstellation Brands operating marginWalmart operating marginConstellation Brands revenue growthWalmart revenue growthConstellation Brands free cash flowWalmart free cash flow
Constellation Brands & Walmart appear in these rankings
Highest Dividend Yield StocksDividend AristocratsHighest Operating Margin StocksHighest FCF Yield Stocks
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.