Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) vs Target Corporation (TGT)
A side-by-side comparison of Constellation Brands, Inc. and Target Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
$122.45Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
TGT
Target Corporation
$155.83Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — STZ vs TGT
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10ySTZ -13.2% (-1.4%/yr)TGT +207.6% (+11.9%/yr)TGT compounded faster over this window
STZ TGT
STZ vs TGT: by the numbers
- •TGT is the larger company ($70.78B vs $20.91B market cap).
- •STZ trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (11.68 vs 16.16 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •STZ converts more revenue to profit (20.14% vs 4.08% net margin).
- •STZ grew revenue faster over the past five years (0.86% vs -0.29% CAGR).
- •STZ pays the higher dividend yield (3.37% vs 2.91%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | STZ | TGT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 11.68 | 16.16 |
| Forward P/E | 10.38 | 15.46 |
| P/S ratio | 2.31 | 0.66 |
| P/B ratio | 2.53 | 3.97 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.44 | 9.14 |
| FCF yield | 8.77% | 6.43% |
Profitability
| Metric | STZ | TGT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 52.62% | 29.30% |
| Operating margin | 32.14% | 5.59% |
| Net margin | 20.14% | 4.08% |
| ROE | 22.10% | 24.61% |
| ROIC | 10.85% | 11.35% |
Dividends
| Metric | STZ | TGT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.37% | 2.91% |
| Payout ratio | 39.12% | 47.51% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | STZ | TGT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 0.86% | -0.29% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -1.59% | -1.34% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -1.73% | -6.17% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -9.18% | -5.58% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, STZ or TGT?
- STZ has the lower trailing P/E: STZ trades at 11.68 and TGT at 16.16. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, STZ or TGT?
- Over the past five years, STZ grew revenue faster — STZ at a 0.86% CAGR versus TGT at -0.29%.
- Does STZ or TGT pay a bigger dividend?
- STZ yields 3.37% and TGT yields 2.91% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is STZ or TGT more profitable?
- STZ runs the higher net margin — STZ at 20.14% versus TGT at 4.08%.
- How have STZ and TGT total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, STZ delivered -1.27% and TGT delivered 11.93% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Constellation Brands P/E ratioTarget P/E ratioConstellation Brands dividend yieldTarget dividend yieldConstellation Brands ROETarget ROEConstellation Brands operating marginTarget operating marginConstellation Brands revenue growthTarget revenue growthConstellation Brands free cash flowTarget free cash flow
Constellation Brands & Target appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.