Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) vs Target Corporation (TGT)
STZ leads on 10 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Constellation Brands, Inc. and Target Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
$148.51Consumer Defensive
TGT
Target Corporation
$135.23Consumer Defensive
Not enough overlapping price history to compare STZ and TGT.
STZ vs TGT: by the numbers
- •TGT is the larger company ($61.42B vs $25.47B market cap).
- •STZ trades at the lower earnings multiple (15.49 vs 17.86 P/E).
- •STZ converts more revenue to profit (18.46% vs 3.24% net margin).
- •TGT grew revenue faster over the past five years (1.62% vs 1.19% CAGR).
- •TGT pays the higher dividend yield (3.37% vs 2.75%).
Which is better, STZ or TGT?
Metric tally: STZ 10 · TGT 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSTZ(lower P/E)
GrowthTGT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeTGT(higher dividend yield)
QualitySTZ(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | STZ | TGT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 15.49● | 17.86 |
| Forward P/E | 11.90● | 15.09 |
| P/S ratio | 2.82 | 0.58● |
| P/B ratio | 3.19● | 3.76 |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.70 | 7.81● |
| FCF yield | 6.95%● | 6.75% |
Profitability
| Metric | STZ | TGT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 51.67%● | 28.14% |
| Operating margin | 31.33%● | 4.49% |
| Net margin | 18.46%● | 3.24% |
| ROE | 20.87% | 21.04% |
| ROIC | 10.48%● | 9.76% |
Dividends
| Metric | STZ | TGT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.75% | 3.37%● |
| Payout ratio | 42.52% | 55.88% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | STZ | TGT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 1.19% | 1.62%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -1.59% | -1.34%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -1.57%● | -12.12% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -7.36%● | -7.66% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, STZ or TGT?
- It depends on your goal. value: STZ (lower P/E); growth: TGT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: TGT (higher dividend yield); quality: STZ (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, STZ leads 10 to 5.
- Is STZ or TGT cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, STZ is cheaper: STZ trades at a 15.49 P/E and TGT at 17.86.
- Which has grown faster, STZ or TGT?
- Over the past five years, TGT grew revenue faster — STZ at a 1.19% CAGR versus TGT at 1.62%.
- Does STZ or TGT pay a bigger dividend?
- STZ yields 2.75% and TGT yields 3.37% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is STZ or TGT more profitable?
- STZ runs the higher net margin — STZ at 18.46% versus TGT at 3.24%.
- Which has been the better investment, STZ or TGT?
- Over the past 10-year, TGT delivered the higher annualized total return — STZ at 1.25% versus TGT at 10.33%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Constellation Brands P/E ratioTarget P/E ratioConstellation Brands dividend yieldTarget dividend yieldConstellation Brands ROETarget ROEConstellation Brands operating marginTarget operating marginConstellation Brands revenue growthTarget revenue growthConstellation Brands free cash flowTarget free cash flow
Constellation Brands & Target appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.