The Kroger Co. (KR) vs Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)
STZ leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of The Kroger Co. and Constellation Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
KR
The Kroger Co.
$64.71Consumer Defensive
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
$148.51Consumer Defensive
Total return — KR vs STZ
growth of $100 · last 30yKR +1245.3%STZ +3669.3%STZ compounded faster
KR STZ
KR vs STZ: by the numbers
- •KR is the larger company ($39.90B vs $25.47B market cap).
- •STZ trades at the lower earnings multiple (15.49 vs 42.02 P/E).
- •STZ converts more revenue to profit (18.46% vs 0.69% net margin).
- •KR grew revenue faster over the past five years (2.19% vs 1.19% CAGR).
- •STZ pays the higher dividend yield (2.75% vs 2.16%).
Which is better, KR or STZ?
Metric tally: KR 6 · STZ 10It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSTZ(lower P/E)
GrowthKR(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeSTZ(higher dividend yield)
QualitySTZ(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | KR | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 42.02 | 15.49● |
| Forward P/E | 11.54● | 11.90 |
| P/S ratio | 0.28● | 2.82 |
| P/B ratio | 6.89 | 3.19● |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.80● | 11.70 |
| FCF yield | 8.64%● | 6.95% |
Profitability
| Metric | KR | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 23.30% | 51.67%● |
| Operating margin | 1.28% | 31.33%● |
| Net margin | 0.69% | 18.46%● |
| ROE | 17.14% | 20.87%● |
| ROIC | 4.70% | 10.48%● |
Dividends
| Metric | KR | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.16% | 2.75%● |
| Payout ratio | 89.74% | 42.52% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | KR | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 2.19%● | 1.19% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -13.96% | -1.59%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -2.23% | -1.57%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 13.20%● | -7.36% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, KR or STZ?
- It depends on your goal. value: STZ (lower P/E); growth: KR (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: STZ (higher dividend yield); quality: STZ (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, STZ leads 10 to 6.
- Is KR or STZ cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, STZ is cheaper: KR trades at a 42.02 P/E and STZ at 15.49.
- Which has grown faster, KR or STZ?
- Over the past five years, KR grew revenue faster — KR at a 2.19% CAGR versus STZ at 1.19%.
- Does KR or STZ pay a bigger dividend?
- KR yields 2.16% and STZ yields 2.75% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is KR or STZ more profitable?
- STZ runs the higher net margin — KR at 0.69% versus STZ at 18.46%.
- Which has been the better investment, KR or STZ?
- Over the past 10-year, KR delivered the higher annualized total return — KR at 8.00% versus STZ at 1.25%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Kroger P/E ratioConstellation Brands P/E ratioKroger dividend yieldConstellation Brands dividend yieldKroger ROEConstellation Brands ROEKroger operating marginConstellation Brands operating marginKroger revenue growthConstellation Brands revenue growthKroger free cash flowConstellation Brands free cash flow
Kroger & Constellation Brands appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.