Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) vs Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)
STZ leads on 9 of 13 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Amazon.com, Inc. and Constellation Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
$238.55Consumer Cyclical
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
$148.51Consumer Defensive
Total return — AMZN vs STZ
growth of $100 · last 29yAMZN +243524.7%STZ +3717.7%AMZN compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
AMZN STZ
AMZN vs STZ: by the numbers
- •AMZN is the larger company ($2.57T vs $25.47B market cap).
- •STZ trades at the lower earnings multiple (15.49 vs 28.53 P/E).
- •STZ converts more revenue to profit (18.46% vs 12.22% net margin).
- •AMZN grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.13% vs 1.19% CAGR).
- •STZ pays a dividend (2.75% yield) while AMZN does not currently pay one.
Which is better, AMZN or STZ?
Metric tally: AMZN 4 · STZ 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSTZ(lower P/E)
GrowthAMZN(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityAMZN(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | AMZN | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 28.53 | 15.49● |
| Forward P/E | 23.69 | 11.90● |
| P/S ratio | 3.49 | 2.82● |
| P/B ratio | 5.87 | 3.19● |
| PEG ratio | 1.10 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.34 | 11.70● |
| FCF yield | — | 6.95% |
Profitability
| Metric | AMZN | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 50.60% | 51.67%● |
| Operating margin | 11.50% | 31.33%● |
| Net margin | 12.22% | 18.46%● |
| ROE | 20.55% | 20.87% |
| ROIC | 10.70%● | 10.48% |
Dividends
| Metric | AMZN | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 2.75% |
| Payout ratio | — | 42.52% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AMZN | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 12.13%● | 1.19% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 27.90%● | -1.59% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -21.57% | -1.57%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 7.35%● | -7.36% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AMZN or STZ?
- It depends on your goal. value: STZ (lower P/E); growth: AMZN (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: AMZN (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, STZ leads 9 to 4.
- Is AMZN or STZ cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, STZ is cheaper: AMZN trades at a 28.53 P/E and STZ at 15.49.
- Which has grown faster, AMZN or STZ?
- Over the past five years, AMZN grew revenue faster — AMZN at a 12.13% CAGR versus STZ at 1.19%.
- Does AMZN or STZ pay a bigger dividend?
- STZ pays a dividend (2.75% yield) while AMZN does not currently pay one.
- Is AMZN or STZ more profitable?
- STZ runs the higher net margin — AMZN at 12.22% versus STZ at 18.46%.
- Which has been the better investment, AMZN or STZ?
- Over the past 10-year, AMZN delivered the higher annualized total return — AMZN at 20.84% versus STZ at 1.25%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Amazon.com P/E ratioConstellation Brands P/E ratioAmazon.com dividend yieldConstellation Brands dividend yieldAmazon.com ROEConstellation Brands ROEAmazon.com operating marginConstellation Brands operating marginAmazon.com revenue growthConstellation Brands revenue growthAmazon.com free cash flowConstellation Brands free cash flow
Amazon.com & Constellation Brands appear in these rankings
Highest Dividend Yield StocksHighest Operating Margin StocksHighest FCF Yield StocksBest 10-Year Total Return Stocks
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.