Apple Inc. (AAPL) vs Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)
A side-by-side comparison of Apple Inc. and Constellation Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: AAPL is classified in Technology; STZ is classified in Consumer Defensive. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
AAPL
Apple Inc.
$332.27TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
$122.45Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — AAPL vs STZ
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yAAPL +1191.3% (+29.2%/yr)STZ -13.2% (-1.4%/yr)AAPL compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
AAPL STZ
AAPL vs STZ: by the numbers
- •AAPL is the larger company ($4.88T vs $20.91B market cap).
- •STZ trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (11.68 vs 38.06 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •AAPL converts more revenue to profit (27.62% vs 20.14% net margin).
- •AAPL grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.10% vs 0.86% CAGR).
- •STZ pays the higher dividend yield (3.37% vs 0.32%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AAPL | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 38.06 | 11.68 |
| Forward P/E | 37.62 | 10.38 |
| P/S ratio | 10.45 | 2.31 |
| P/B ratio | 45.39 | 2.53 |
| EV / EBITDA | 29.32 | 9.44 |
| FCF yield | 2.80% | 8.77% |
Profitability
| Metric | AAPL | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 48.65% | 52.62% |
| Operating margin | 33.17% | 32.14% |
| Net margin | 27.62% | 20.14% |
| ROE | 119.91% | 22.10% |
| ROIC | 51.87% | 10.85% |
Dividends
| Metric | AAPL | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.32% | 3.37% |
| Payout ratio | 12.14% | 39.12% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AAPL | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.10% | 0.86% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 17.73% | -1.59% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 7.60% | -1.73% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 17.58% | -9.18% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, AAPL or STZ?
- STZ has the lower trailing P/E: AAPL trades at 38.06 and STZ at 11.68. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, AAPL or STZ?
- Over the past five years, AAPL grew revenue faster — AAPL at a 6.10% CAGR versus STZ at 0.86%.
- Does AAPL or STZ pay a bigger dividend?
- AAPL yields 0.32% and STZ yields 3.37% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is AAPL or STZ more profitable?
- AAPL runs the higher net margin — AAPL at 27.62% versus STZ at 20.14%.
- How have AAPL and STZ total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, AAPL delivered 30.06% and STZ delivered -1.27% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Apple P/E ratioConstellation Brands P/E ratioApple dividend yieldConstellation Brands dividend yieldApple ROEConstellation Brands ROEApple operating marginConstellation Brands operating marginApple revenue growthConstellation Brands revenue growthApple free cash flowConstellation Brands free cash flow
Apple & Constellation Brands appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.