Apple Inc. (AAPL) vs Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)
AAPL and STZ are evenly matched — 8 metrics each of 16.
A side-by-side comparison of Apple Inc. and Constellation Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — AAPL vs STZ
growth of $100 · last 30yAAPL +136113.9%STZ +3669.3%AAPL compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
AAPL STZ
AAPL vs STZ: by the numbers
- •AAPL is the larger company ($4.28T vs $25.47B market cap).
- •STZ trades at the lower earnings multiple (15.49 vs 35.20 P/E).
- •AAPL converts more revenue to profit (27.15% vs 18.46% net margin).
- •AAPL grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.76% vs 1.19% CAGR).
- •STZ pays the higher dividend yield (2.75% vs 0.36%).
Which is better, AAPL or STZ?
Metric tally: AAPL 8 · STZ 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSTZ(lower P/E)
GrowthAAPL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeSTZ(higher dividend yield)
QualityAAPL(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | AAPL | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 35.20 | 15.49● |
| Forward P/E | 30.21 | 11.90● |
| P/S ratio | 9.52 | 2.82● |
| P/B ratio | 40.37 | 3.19● |
| PEG ratio | 1.51 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 27.12 | 11.70● |
| FCF yield | 3.00% | 6.95%● |
Profitability
| Metric | AAPL | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 47.86% | 51.67%● |
| Operating margin | 32.64%● | 31.33% |
| Net margin | 27.15%● | 18.46% |
| ROE | 115.10%● | 20.87% |
| ROIC | 51.97%● | 10.48% |
Dividends
| Metric | AAPL | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | 2.75%● |
| Payout ratio | 14.02% | 42.52% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AAPL | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.76%● | 1.19% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 17.73%● | -1.59% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 7.38%● | -1.57% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 18.58%● | -7.36% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AAPL or STZ?
- It depends on your goal. value: STZ (lower P/E); growth: AAPL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: STZ (higher dividend yield); quality: AAPL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
- Is AAPL or STZ cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, STZ is cheaper: AAPL trades at a 35.20 P/E and STZ at 15.49.
- Which has grown faster, AAPL or STZ?
- Over the past five years, AAPL grew revenue faster — AAPL at a 6.76% CAGR versus STZ at 1.19%.
- Does AAPL or STZ pay a bigger dividend?
- AAPL yields 0.36% and STZ yields 2.75% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is AAPL or STZ more profitable?
- AAPL runs the higher net margin — AAPL at 27.15% versus STZ at 18.46%.
- Which has been the better investment, AAPL or STZ?
- Over the past 10-year, AAPL delivered the higher annualized total return — AAPL at 29.17% versus STZ at 1.25%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Apple P/E ratioConstellation Brands P/E ratioApple dividend yieldConstellation Brands dividend yieldApple ROEConstellation Brands ROEApple operating marginConstellation Brands operating marginApple revenue growthConstellation Brands revenue growthApple free cash flowConstellation Brands free cash flow
Apple & Constellation Brands appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.