Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) vs Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)
META leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics, though STZ is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Meta Platforms, Inc. and Constellation Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
$566.98Communication Services
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
$148.51Consumer Defensive
Total return — META vs STZ
growth of $100 · last 14yMETA +1383.1%STZ +690.4%META compounded faster
META STZ
META vs STZ: by the numbers
- •META is the larger company ($1.44T vs $25.47B market cap).
- •STZ trades at the lower earnings multiple (15.49 vs 20.62 P/E).
- •META converts more revenue to profit (32.84% vs 18.46% net margin).
- •META grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.89% vs 1.19% CAGR).
- •STZ pays the higher dividend yield (2.75% vs 0.37%).
Which is better, META or STZ?
Metric tally: META 9 · STZ 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSTZ(lower P/E)
GrowthMETA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeSTZ(higher dividend yield)
QualityMETA(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | META | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 20.62 | 15.49● |
| Forward P/E | 16.20 | 11.90● |
| P/S ratio | 6.76 | 2.82● |
| P/B ratio | 5.97 | 3.19● |
| PEG ratio | 1.11 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.37 | 11.70● |
| FCF yield | 3.32% | 6.95%● |
Profitability
| Metric | META | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 81.94%● | 51.67% |
| Operating margin | 41.21%● | 31.33% |
| Net margin | 32.84%● | 18.46% |
| ROE | 28.97%● | 20.87% |
| ROIC | 17.95%● | 10.48% |
Dividends
| Metric | META | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.37% | 2.75%● |
| Payout ratio | 8.76% | 42.52% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | META | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 17.89%● | 1.19% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 18.60%● | -1.59% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 14.84%● | -1.57% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 11.51%● | -7.36% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, META or STZ?
- It depends on your goal. value: STZ (lower P/E); growth: META (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: STZ (higher dividend yield); quality: META (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, META leads 9 to 7.
- Is META or STZ cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, STZ is cheaper: META trades at a 20.62 P/E and STZ at 15.49.
- Which has grown faster, META or STZ?
- Over the past five years, META grew revenue faster — META at a 17.89% CAGR versus STZ at 1.19%.
- Does META or STZ pay a bigger dividend?
- META yields 0.37% and STZ yields 2.75% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is META or STZ more profitable?
- META runs the higher net margin — META at 32.84% versus STZ at 18.46%.
- Which has been the better investment, META or STZ?
- Over the past 10-year, META delivered the higher annualized total return — META at 17.22% versus STZ at 1.25%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Meta Platforms P/E ratioConstellation Brands P/E ratioMeta Platforms dividend yieldConstellation Brands dividend yieldMeta Platforms ROEConstellation Brands ROEMeta Platforms operating marginConstellation Brands operating marginMeta Platforms revenue growthConstellation Brands revenue growthMeta Platforms free cash flowConstellation Brands free cash flow
Meta Platforms & Constellation Brands appear in these rankings
Highest Dividend Yield StocksFastest Revenue Growth StocksHighest ROE StocksHighest Operating Margin Stocks
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.