Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) vs Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)
A side-by-side comparison of Meta Platforms, Inc. and Constellation Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: META is classified in Communication Services; STZ is classified in Consumer Defensive. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
$648.03Communication ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
$122.45Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — META vs STZ
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yMETA +418.8% (+17.9%/yr)STZ -14.4% (-1.5%/yr)META compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
META STZ
META vs STZ: by the numbers
- •META is the larger company ($1.65T vs $20.91B market cap).
- •STZ trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (11.68 vs 24.42 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •META converts more revenue to profit (29.84% vs 20.14% net margin).
- •META grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.85% vs 0.86% CAGR).
- •STZ pays the higher dividend yield (3.37% vs 0.33%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | META | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 24.42 | 11.68 |
| Forward P/E | 20.64 | 10.38 |
| P/S ratio | 7.23 | 2.31 |
| P/B ratio | 6.32 | 2.53 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.94 | 9.44 |
| FCF yield | 2.48% | 8.77% |
Profitability
| Metric | META | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 81.75% | 52.62% |
| Operating margin | 38.08% | 32.14% |
| Net margin | 29.84% | 20.14% |
| ROE | 26.07% | 22.10% |
| ROIC | 17.18% | 10.85% |
Dividends
| Metric | META | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.33% | 3.37% |
| Payout ratio | 7.91% | 39.12% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | META | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 16.85% | 0.86% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 18.60% | -1.59% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 4.96% | -1.73% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 11.41% | -9.18% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, META or STZ?
- STZ has the lower trailing P/E: META trades at 24.42 and STZ at 11.68. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, META or STZ?
- Over the past five years, META grew revenue faster — META at a 16.85% CAGR versus STZ at 0.86%.
- Does META or STZ pay a bigger dividend?
- META yields 0.33% and STZ yields 3.37% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is META or STZ more profitable?
- META runs the higher net margin — META at 29.84% versus STZ at 20.14%.
- How have META and STZ total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, META delivered 17.72% and STZ delivered -1.27% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Meta Platforms P/E ratioConstellation Brands P/E ratioMeta Platforms dividend yieldConstellation Brands dividend yieldMeta Platforms ROEConstellation Brands ROEMeta Platforms operating marginConstellation Brands operating marginMeta Platforms revenue growthConstellation Brands revenue growthMeta Platforms free cash flowConstellation Brands free cash flow
Meta Platforms & Constellation Brands appear in these rankings
Highest Dividend Yield StocksFastest Revenue Growth StocksHighest ROE StocksHighest Operating Margin Stocks
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.