Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) vs Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)
STZ leads on 9 of 13 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Pinterest, Inc. and Constellation Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
PINS
Pinterest, Inc.
$20.21Communication Services
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
$148.51Consumer Defensive
Total return — PINS vs STZ
growth of $100 · last 7yPINS -19.1%STZ -27.7%PINS compounded faster
PINS STZ
PINS vs STZ: by the numbers
- •STZ is the larger company ($25.47B vs $13.43B market cap).
- •STZ trades at the lower earnings multiple (15.49 vs 42.44 P/E).
- •STZ converts more revenue to profit (18.46% vs 7.64% net margin).
- •PINS grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.08% vs 1.19% CAGR).
- •STZ pays a dividend (2.75% yield) while PINS does not currently pay one.
Which is better, PINS or STZ?
Metric tally: PINS 4 · STZ 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSTZ(lower P/E)
GrowthPINS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualitySTZ(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | PINS | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 42.44 | 15.49● |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.90 |
| P/S ratio | 2.94 | 2.82● |
| P/B ratio | 4.51 | 3.19● |
| EV / EBITDA | 30.93 | 11.70● |
| FCF yield | 9.38%● | 6.95% |
Profitability
| Metric | PINS | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 79.86%● | 51.67% |
| Operating margin | 7.36% | 31.33%● |
| Net margin | 7.64% | 18.46%● |
| ROE | 11.73% | 20.87%● |
| ROIC | 5.88% | 10.48%● |
Dividends
| Metric | PINS | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 2.75% |
| Payout ratio | — | 42.52% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | PINS | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 18.08%● | 1.19% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | — | -1.59% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 39.27%● | -1.57% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -21.58% | -7.36%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, PINS or STZ?
- It depends on your goal. value: STZ (lower P/E); growth: PINS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: STZ (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, STZ leads 9 to 4.
- Is PINS or STZ cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, STZ is cheaper: PINS trades at a 42.44 P/E and STZ at 15.49.
- Which has grown faster, PINS or STZ?
- Over the past five years, PINS grew revenue faster — PINS at a 18.08% CAGR versus STZ at 1.19%.
- Does PINS or STZ pay a bigger dividend?
- STZ pays a dividend (2.75% yield) while PINS does not currently pay one.
- Is PINS or STZ more profitable?
- STZ runs the higher net margin — PINS at 7.64% versus STZ at 18.46%.
- Which has been the better investment, PINS or STZ?
- Over the past 5-year, STZ delivered the higher annualized total return — PINS at -21.58% versus STZ at 1.25%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Pinterest P/E ratioConstellation Brands P/E ratioPinterest dividend yieldConstellation Brands dividend yieldPinterest ROEConstellation Brands ROEPinterest operating marginConstellation Brands operating marginPinterest revenue growthConstellation Brands revenue growthPinterest free cash flowConstellation Brands free cash flow
Pinterest & Constellation Brands appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.