Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) vs Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)
NFLX leads on 8 of 15 compared metrics, though STZ is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Netflix, Inc. and Constellation Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
$80.34Communication Services
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
$148.51Consumer Defensive
Total return — NFLX vs STZ
growth of $100 · last 24yNFLX +67051.5%STZ +972.3%NFLX compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
NFLX STZ
NFLX vs STZ: by the numbers
- •NFLX is the larger company ($338.30B vs $25.47B market cap).
- •STZ trades at the lower earnings multiple (15.49 vs 25.92 P/E).
- •NFLX converts more revenue to profit (28.52% vs 18.46% net margin).
- •NFLX grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.18% vs 1.19% CAGR).
- •STZ pays a dividend (2.75% yield) while NFLX does not currently pay one.
Which is better, NFLX or STZ?
Metric tally: NFLX 8 · STZ 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSTZ(lower P/E)
GrowthNFLX(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityNFLX(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | NFLX | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 25.92 | 15.49● |
| Forward P/E | 20.96 | 11.90● |
| P/S ratio | 7.36 | 2.82● |
| P/B ratio | 11.09 | 3.19● |
| PEG ratio | 1.33 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.28● | 11.70 |
| FCF yield | 3.44% | 6.95%● |
Profitability
| Metric | NFLX | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 49.03% | 51.67%● |
| Operating margin | 29.72% | 31.33%● |
| Net margin | 28.52%● | 18.46% |
| ROE | 42.97%● | 20.87% |
| ROIC | 25.22%● | 10.48% |
Dividends
| Metric | NFLX | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 2.75% |
| Payout ratio | — | 42.52% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | NFLX | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 12.18%● | 1.19% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 32.58%● | -1.59% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 37.02%● | -1.57% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 10.44%● | -7.36% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, NFLX or STZ?
- It depends on your goal. value: STZ (lower P/E); growth: NFLX (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: NFLX (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NFLX leads 8 to 7.
- Is NFLX or STZ cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, STZ is cheaper: NFLX trades at a 25.92 P/E and STZ at 15.49.
- Which has grown faster, NFLX or STZ?
- Over the past five years, NFLX grew revenue faster — NFLX at a 12.18% CAGR versus STZ at 1.19%.
- Does NFLX or STZ pay a bigger dividend?
- STZ pays a dividend (2.75% yield) while NFLX does not currently pay one.
- Is NFLX or STZ more profitable?
- NFLX runs the higher net margin — NFLX at 28.52% versus STZ at 18.46%.
- Which has been the better investment, NFLX or STZ?
- Over the past 10-year, NFLX delivered the higher annualized total return — NFLX at 23.95% versus STZ at 1.25%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Netflix P/E ratioConstellation Brands P/E ratioNetflix dividend yieldConstellation Brands dividend yieldNetflix ROEConstellation Brands ROENetflix operating marginConstellation Brands operating marginNetflix revenue growthConstellation Brands revenue growthNetflix free cash flowConstellation Brands free cash flow
Netflix & Constellation Brands appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.