Snap Inc. (SNAP) vs Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)
STZ leads on 7 of 10 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Snap Inc. and Constellation Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
SNAP
Snap Inc.
$5.26Communication Services
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
$148.51Consumer Defensive
Total return — SNAP vs STZ
growth of $100 · last 9ySNAP -80.6%STZ -6.5%STZ compounded faster
SNAP STZ
SNAP vs STZ: by the numbers
- •STZ is the larger company ($25.47B vs $8.90B market cap).
- •STZ is profitable (18.46% net margin) while SNAP runs a net loss (-6.72%).
- •SNAP grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.73% vs 1.19% CAGR).
- •STZ pays a dividend (2.75% yield) while SNAP does not currently pay one.
Which is better, SNAP or STZ?
Metric tally: SNAP 3 · STZ 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthSNAP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualitySTZ(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | SNAP | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | — | 15.49 |
| Forward P/E | 42.69 | 11.90● |
| P/S ratio | 1.46● | 2.82 |
| P/B ratio | 4.26 | 3.19● |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 11.70 |
| FCF yield | 6.86% | 6.95% |
Profitability
| Metric | SNAP | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 55.77%● | 51.67% |
| Operating margin | -6.77% | 31.33%● |
| Net margin | -6.72% | 18.46%● |
| ROE | -19.66% | 20.87%● |
| ROIC | -8.20% | 10.48%● |
Dividends
| Metric | SNAP | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 2.75% |
| Payout ratio | — | 42.52% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | SNAP | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 16.73%● | 1.19% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | — | -1.59% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | — | -1.57% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -39.34% | -7.36%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, SNAP or STZ?
- It depends on your goal. growth: SNAP (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: STZ (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, STZ leads 7 to 3.
- Which has grown faster, SNAP or STZ?
- Over the past five years, SNAP grew revenue faster — SNAP at a 16.73% CAGR versus STZ at 1.19%.
- Does SNAP or STZ pay a bigger dividend?
- STZ pays a dividend (2.75% yield) while SNAP does not currently pay one.
- Is SNAP or STZ more profitable?
- STZ runs the higher net margin — SNAP at -6.72% versus STZ at 18.46%.
- Which has been the better investment, SNAP or STZ?
- Over the past 5-year, STZ delivered the higher annualized total return — SNAP at -39.34% versus STZ at 1.25%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Snap P/E ratioConstellation Brands P/E ratioSnap dividend yieldConstellation Brands dividend yieldSnap ROEConstellation Brands ROESnap operating marginConstellation Brands operating marginSnap revenue growthConstellation Brands revenue growthSnap free cash flowConstellation Brands free cash flow
Snap & Constellation Brands appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.