Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) vs Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)
MSFT leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics, though STZ is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Microsoft Corporation and Constellation Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
$390.74Technology
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
$148.51Consumer Defensive
Total return — MSFT vs STZ
growth of $100 · last 30yMSFT +4981.1%STZ +3669.3%MSFT compounded faster
MSFT STZ
MSFT vs STZ: by the numbers
- •MSFT is the larger company ($2.90T vs $25.47B market cap).
- •STZ trades at the lower earnings multiple (15.49 vs 23.26 P/E).
- •MSFT converts more revenue to profit (39.34% vs 18.46% net margin).
- •MSFT grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.75% vs 1.19% CAGR).
- •STZ pays the higher dividend yield (2.75% vs 0.91%).
Which is better, MSFT or STZ?
Metric tally: MSFT 9 · STZ 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSTZ(lower P/E)
GrowthMSFT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeSTZ(higher dividend yield)
QualityMSFT(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | MSFT | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 23.26 | 15.49● |
| Forward P/E | 20.12 | 11.90● |
| P/S ratio | 9.14 | 2.82● |
| P/B ratio | 7.02 | 3.19● |
| PEG ratio | 2.34 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.60 | 11.70● |
| FCF yield | 2.51% | 6.95%● |
Profitability
| Metric | MSFT | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 68.31%● | 51.67% |
| Operating margin | 46.80%● | 31.33% |
| Net margin | 39.34%● | 18.46% |
| ROE | 30.22%● | 20.87% |
| ROIC | 21.63%● | 10.48% |
Dividends
| Metric | MSFT | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.91% | 2.75%● |
| Payout ratio | 25.99% | 42.52% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MSFT | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 14.75%● | 1.19% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 18.68%● | -1.59% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 6.27%● | -1.57% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 9.56%● | -7.36% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MSFT or STZ?
- It depends on your goal. value: STZ (lower P/E); growth: MSFT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: STZ (higher dividend yield); quality: MSFT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MSFT leads 9 to 7.
- Is MSFT or STZ cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, STZ is cheaper: MSFT trades at a 23.26 P/E and STZ at 15.49.
- Which has grown faster, MSFT or STZ?
- Over the past five years, MSFT grew revenue faster — MSFT at a 14.75% CAGR versus STZ at 1.19%.
- Does MSFT or STZ pay a bigger dividend?
- MSFT yields 0.91% and STZ yields 2.75% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is MSFT or STZ more profitable?
- MSFT runs the higher net margin — MSFT at 39.34% versus STZ at 18.46%.
- Which has been the better investment, MSFT or STZ?
- Over the past 10-year, MSFT delivered the higher annualized total return — MSFT at 23.98% versus STZ at 1.25%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Microsoft P/E ratioConstellation Brands P/E ratioMicrosoft dividend yieldConstellation Brands dividend yieldMicrosoft ROEConstellation Brands ROEMicrosoft operating marginConstellation Brands operating marginMicrosoft revenue growthConstellation Brands revenue growthMicrosoft free cash flowConstellation Brands free cash flow
Microsoft & Constellation Brands appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.