The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) vs Walmart Inc. (WMT)
PG leads on 13 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of The Procter & Gamble Company and Walmart Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
$149.61Consumer Defensive
WMT
Walmart Inc.
$121.04Consumer Defensive
Total return — PG vs WMT
growth of $100 · last 30yPG +575.4%WMT +2695.4%WMT compounded faster
PG WMT
PG vs WMT: by the numbers
- •WMT is the larger company ($963.25B vs $348.38B market cap).
- •PG trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.87 vs 42.47 P/E).
- •PG converts more revenue to profit (19.22% vs 3.18% net margin).
- •WMT grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.20% vs 2.98% CAGR).
- •PG pays the higher dividend yield (2.85% vs 0.80%).
Which is better, PG or WMT?
Metric tally: PG 13 · WMT 4It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValuePG(lower P/E)
GrowthWMT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomePG(higher dividend yield)
QualityPG(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | PG | WMT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 21.87● | 42.47 |
| Forward P/E | 21.17● | 36.88 |
| P/S ratio | 4.17 | 1.33● |
| P/B ratio | 6.63● | 10.26 |
| PEG ratio | 3.09● | 3.29 |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.61● | 23.28 |
| FCF yield | 4.16%● | 1.30% |
Profitability
| Metric | PG | WMT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 50.33%● | 24.98% |
| Operating margin | 23.24%● | 4.16% |
| Net margin | 19.22%● | 3.18% |
| ROE | 30.58%● | 24.44% |
| ROIC | 16.47%● | 11.87% |
Dividends
| Metric | PG | WMT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.85%● | 0.80% |
| Payout ratio | 63.85% | 35.22% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | PG | WMT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 2.98% | 5.20%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 5.39% | 10.95%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -1.64%● | -9.94% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 4.73% | 22.41%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, PG or WMT?
- It depends on your goal. value: PG (lower P/E); growth: WMT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: PG (higher dividend yield); quality: PG (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, PG leads 13 to 4.
- Is PG or WMT cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, PG is cheaper: PG trades at a 21.87 P/E and WMT at 42.47.
- Which has grown faster, PG or WMT?
- Over the past five years, WMT grew revenue faster — PG at a 2.98% CAGR versus WMT at 5.20%.
- Does PG or WMT pay a bigger dividend?
- PG yields 2.85% and WMT yields 0.80% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is PG or WMT more profitable?
- PG runs the higher net margin — PG at 19.22% versus WMT at 3.18%.
- Which has been the better investment, PG or WMT?
- Over the past 10-year, WMT delivered the higher annualized total return — PG at 8.98% versus WMT at 19.73%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Procter & Gamble P/E ratioWalmart P/E ratioProcter & Gamble dividend yieldWalmart dividend yieldProcter & Gamble ROEWalmart ROEProcter & Gamble operating marginWalmart operating marginProcter & Gamble revenue growthWalmart revenue growthProcter & Gamble free cash flowWalmart free cash flow
Procter & Gamble & Walmart appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.