Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) vs Walmart Inc. (WMT)
CL leads on 11 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Colgate-Palmolive Company and Walmart Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company
$89.45Consumer Defensive
WMT
Walmart Inc.
$121.04Consumer Defensive
Not enough overlapping price history to compare CL and WMT.
CL vs WMT: by the numbers
- •WMT is the larger company ($963.25B vs $71.58B market cap).
- •CL trades at the lower earnings multiple (34.75 vs 42.47 P/E).
- •CL converts more revenue to profit (10.04% vs 3.18% net margin).
- •WMT grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.20% vs 4.46% CAGR).
- •CL pays the higher dividend yield (2.34% vs 0.80%).
Which is better, CL or WMT?
Metric tally: CL 11 · WMT 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCL(lower P/E)
GrowthWMT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeCL(higher dividend yield)
QualityCL(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | CL | WMT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 34.75● | 42.47 |
| Forward P/E | 22.22● | 36.88 |
| P/S ratio | 3.46 | 1.33● |
| P/B ratio | 496.66 | 10.26● |
| PEG ratio | — | 3.29 |
| EV / EBITDA | 21.17● | 23.28 |
| FCF yield | 5.23%● | 1.30% |
Profitability
| Metric | CL | WMT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 60.06%● | 24.98% |
| Operating margin | 21.21%● | 4.16% |
| Net margin | 10.04%● | 3.18% |
| ROE | 1439.31%● | 24.44% |
| ROIC | 30.34%● | 11.87% |
Dividends
| Metric | CL | WMT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.34%● | 0.80% |
| Payout ratio | 79.17% | 35.22% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CL | WMT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.46% | 5.20%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -3.47% | 10.95%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 3.88%● | -9.94% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 3.78% | 22.41%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CL or WMT?
- It depends on your goal. value: CL (lower P/E); growth: WMT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: CL (higher dividend yield); quality: CL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CL leads 11 to 5.
- Is CL or WMT cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CL is cheaper: CL trades at a 34.75 P/E and WMT at 42.47.
- Which has grown faster, CL or WMT?
- Over the past five years, WMT grew revenue faster — CL at a 4.46% CAGR versus WMT at 5.20%.
- Does CL or WMT pay a bigger dividend?
- CL yields 2.34% and WMT yields 0.80% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CL or WMT more profitable?
- CL runs the higher net margin — CL at 10.04% versus WMT at 3.18%.
- Which has been the better investment, CL or WMT?
- Over the past 10-year, WMT delivered the higher annualized total return — CL at 4.61% versus WMT at 19.73%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Colgate-Palmolive P/E ratioWalmart P/E ratioColgate-Palmolive dividend yieldWalmart dividend yieldColgate-Palmolive ROEWalmart ROEColgate-Palmolive operating marginWalmart operating marginColgate-Palmolive revenue growthWalmart revenue growthColgate-Palmolive free cash flowWalmart free cash flow
Colgate-Palmolive & Walmart appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.