Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) vs Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST)

A side-by-side comparison of Colgate-Palmolive Company and Costco Wholesale Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 31, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total returnCL vs COST

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30y
CL +1645.6%COST +11886.5%COST compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
1001k10k100kStart $100200120062011201620212026$1,746$11,987
CL COST

CL vs COST: by the numbers

  • COST is the larger company ($422.14B vs $73.06B market cap).
  • CL trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (36.17 vs 47.88 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • CL converts more revenue to profit (9.68% vs 3.01% net margin).
  • COST grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.48% vs 4.26% CAGR).
  • CL pays the higher dividend yield (2.29% vs 0.56%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCLCOST
P/E ratio36.1747.88
Forward P/E23.9846.34
P/S ratio3.501.44
P/B ratio311.7412.62
PEG ratioN/A5.23
EV / EBITDA16.5629.90
FCF yield5.24%2.08%

Profitability

MetricCLCOST
Gross margin60.42%12.88%
Operating margin20.65%3.82%
Net margin9.68%3.01%
ROE863.14%26.38%
ROIC30.34%19.44%

Dividends

MetricCLCOST
Dividend yield2.29%0.56%
Payout ratio79.17%29.44%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCLCOST
Revenue CAGR (5Y)4.26%9.48%
EPS CAGR (5Y)-3.47%15.04%
FCF CAGR (5Y)7.70%4.95%
Total return CAGR (5Y)5.27%17.97%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CL or COST?
CL has the lower trailing P/E: CL trades at 36.17 and COST at 47.88. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CL or COST?
Over the past five years, COST grew revenue faster — CL at a 4.26% CAGR versus COST at 9.48%.
Does CL or COST pay a bigger dividend?
CL yields 2.29% and COST yields 0.56% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CL or COST more profitable?
CL runs the higher net margin — CL at 9.68% versus COST at 3.01%.
How have CL and COST total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, CL delivered 4.50% and COST delivered 19.98% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 31, 2026.