Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) vs Meta Platforms, Inc. (META)
A side-by-side comparison of Fair Isaac Corporation and Meta Platforms, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: FICO is classified in Technology; META is classified in Communication Services. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
FICO
Fair Isaac Corporation
$985.39TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
$648.03Communication ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — FICO vs META
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yFICO +625.3% (+21.9%/yr)META +406.4% (+17.6%/yr)FICO compounded faster over this window
FICO META
FICO vs META: by the numbers
- •META is the larger company ($1.65T vs $21.28B market cap).
- •META trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (24.42 vs 28.46 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •FICO converts more revenue to profit (34.05% vs 29.84% net margin).
- •META grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.85% vs 12.03% CAGR).
- •META pays a dividend (0.33% yield), while FICO is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | FICO | META |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 28.46 | 24.42 |
| Forward P/E | 22.95 | 20.64 |
| P/S ratio | 8.89 | 7.23 |
| P/B ratio | N/A | 6.32 |
| EV / EBITDA | 21.26 | 15.94 |
| FCF yield | 4.68% | 2.48% |
Profitability
| Metric | FICO | META |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 85.10% | 81.75% |
| Operating margin | 51.65% | 38.08% |
| Net margin | 34.05% | 29.84% |
| ROE | N/A | 26.07% |
| ROIC | 59.42% | 17.18% |
Dividends
| Metric | FICO | META |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 0.33% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 7.91% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | FICO | META |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 12.03% | 16.85% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 27.04% | 18.60% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 16.63% | 4.96% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 16.31% | 11.41% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, FICO or META?
- META has the lower trailing P/E: FICO trades at 28.46 and META at 24.42. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, FICO or META?
- Over the past five years, META grew revenue faster — FICO at a 12.03% CAGR versus META at 16.85%.
- Does FICO or META pay a bigger dividend?
- META pays a dividend (0.33% yield), while FICO is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
- Is FICO or META more profitable?
- FICO runs the higher net margin — FICO at 34.05% versus META at 29.84%.
- How have FICO and META total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, FICO delivered 22.28% and META delivered 17.72% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Fair Isaac P/E ratioMeta Platforms P/E ratioMeta Platforms dividend yieldFair Isaac ROEMeta Platforms ROEFair Isaac operating marginMeta Platforms operating marginFair Isaac revenue growthMeta Platforms revenue growthFair Isaac free cash flowMeta Platforms free cash flow
Fair Isaac & Meta Platforms appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.