Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) vs The Procter & Gamble Company (PG)
BUD leads on 12 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV and The Procter & Gamble Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
BUD
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV
$82.91Consumer Defensive
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
$149.61Consumer Defensive
Total return — BUD vs PG
growth of $100 · last 17yBUD +115.4%PG +187.7%PG compounded faster
BUD PG
BUD vs PG: by the numbers
- •PG is the larger company ($348.38B vs $160.41B market cap).
- •BUD trades at the lower earnings multiple (13.57 vs 21.87 P/E).
- •PG converts more revenue to profit (19.22% vs 10.14% net margin).
- •BUD grew revenue faster over the past five years (3.94% vs 2.98% CAGR).
- •PG pays the higher dividend yield (2.85% vs 1.63%).
Which is better, BUD or PG?
Metric tally: BUD 12 · PG 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueBUD(lower P/E)
GrowthBUD(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomePG(higher dividend yield)
QualityPG(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | BUD | PG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 13.57● | 21.87 |
| Forward P/E | 17.10● | 21.17 |
| P/S ratio | 1.36● | 4.17 |
| P/B ratio | 1.88● | 6.63 |
| PEG ratio | 1.00● | 3.09 |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.41● | 16.61 |
| FCF yield | 13.64%● | 4.16% |
Profitability
| Metric | BUD | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 55.67%● | 50.33% |
| Operating margin | 31.82%● | 23.24% |
| Net margin | 10.14% | 19.22%● |
| ROE | 13.99% | 30.58%● |
| ROIC | 6.32% | 16.47%● |
Dividends
| Metric | BUD | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.63% | 2.85%● |
| Payout ratio | 38.95% | 63.85% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BUD | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.94%● | 2.98% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 37.66%● | 5.39% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 10.48%● | -1.64% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 2.64% | 4.73%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BUD or PG?
- It depends on your goal. value: BUD (lower P/E); growth: BUD (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: PG (higher dividend yield); quality: PG (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, BUD leads 12 to 5.
- Is BUD or PG cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, BUD is cheaper: BUD trades at a 13.57 P/E and PG at 21.87.
- Which has grown faster, BUD or PG?
- Over the past five years, BUD grew revenue faster — BUD at a 3.94% CAGR versus PG at 2.98%.
- Does BUD or PG pay a bigger dividend?
- BUD yields 1.63% and PG yields 2.85% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BUD or PG more profitable?
- PG runs the higher net margin — BUD at 10.14% versus PG at 19.22%.
- Which has been the better investment, BUD or PG?
- Over the past 10-year, PG delivered the higher annualized total return — BUD at -2.09% versus PG at 8.98%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV P/E ratioProcter & Gamble P/E ratioAnheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV dividend yieldProcter & Gamble dividend yieldAnheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV ROEProcter & Gamble ROEAnheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV operating marginProcter & Gamble operating marginAnheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV revenue growthProcter & Gamble revenue growthAnheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV free cash flowProcter & Gamble free cash flow
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV & Procter & Gamble appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.