Is BUD or KMB cheaper?

On trailing earnings, BUD is cheaper: BUD trades at a 13.57 P/E and KMB at 16.06.

Which has grown faster, BUD or KMB?

Over the past five years, BUD grew revenue faster — BUD at a 3.94% CAGR versus KMB at -2.61%.

Does BUD or KMB pay a bigger dividend?

BUD yields 1.63% and KMB yields 4.97% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is BUD or KMB more profitable?

KMB runs the higher net margin — BUD at 10.14% versus KMB at 12.81%.

Which has been the better investment, BUD or KMB?

Over the past 10-year, KMB delivered the higher annualized total return — BUD at -2.09% versus KMB at 1.05%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) vs Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB)

BUD leads on 11 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV and Kimberly-Clark Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

BUD

Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV

$160.41B

$82.91Consumer Defensive

KMB

Kimberly-Clark Corporation

$33.95B

$102.29Consumer Defensive

Total return — BUD vs KMB

growth of $100 · last 17y

BUD +115.9%KMB +101.6%BUD compounded faster

BUD KMB

BUD vs KMB: by the numbers

•BUD is the larger company ($160.41B vs $33.95B market cap).
•BUD trades at the lower earnings multiple (13.57 vs 16.06 P/E).
•KMB converts more revenue to profit (12.81% vs 10.14% net margin).
•BUD grew revenue faster over the past five years (3.94% vs -2.61% CAGR).
•KMB pays the higher dividend yield (4.97% vs 1.63%).

Which is better, BUD or KMB?

Metric tally: BUD 11 · KMB 5

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueBUD(lower P/E)

GrowthBUD(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeKMB(higher dividend yield)

QualityKMB(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	BUD	KMB
P/E ratio	13.57●	16.06
Forward P/E	17.10	13.49●
P/S ratio	1.36●	2.06
P/B ratio	1.88●	18.98
PEG ratio	1.00	—
EV / EBITDA	6.41●	13.26
FCF yield	13.64%●	7.56%

Profitability

Metric	BUD	KMB
Gross margin	55.67%●	35.86%
Operating margin	31.82%●	13.27%
Net margin	10.14%	12.81%●
ROE	13.99%	117.98%●
ROIC	6.32%	17.62%●

Dividends

Metric	BUD	KMB
Dividend yield	1.63%	4.97%●
Payout ratio	38.95%	83.55%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BUD	KMB
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	3.94%●	-2.61%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	37.66%●	-2.50%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	10.48%●	3.38%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	2.64%●	-0.94%

Frequently asked

Which is better, BUD or KMB?: It depends on your goal. value: BUD (lower P/E); growth: BUD (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: KMB (higher dividend yield); quality: KMB (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, BUD leads 11 to 5.
Is BUD or KMB cheaper?: On trailing earnings, BUD is cheaper: BUD trades at a 13.57 P/E and KMB at 16.06.
Which has grown faster, BUD or KMB?: Over the past five years, BUD grew revenue faster — BUD at a 3.94% CAGR versus KMB at -2.61%.
Does BUD or KMB pay a bigger dividend?: BUD yields 1.63% and KMB yields 4.97% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is BUD or KMB more profitable?: KMB runs the higher net margin — BUD at 10.14% versus KMB at 12.81%.
Which has been the better investment, BUD or KMB?: Over the past 10-year, KMB delivered the higher annualized total return — BUD at -2.09% versus KMB at 1.05%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BUD analysis Full KMB analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV P/E ratio Kimberly-Clark P/E ratio Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV dividend yield Kimberly-Clark dividend yield Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV ROE Kimberly-Clark ROE Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV operating margin Kimberly-Clark operating margin Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV revenue growth Kimberly-Clark revenue growth Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV free cash flow Kimberly-Clark free cash flow

Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV & Kimberly-Clark appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Dividend Aristocrats Highest ROE Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.