Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) vs Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL)
BUD leads on 9 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV and Colgate-Palmolive Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
BUD
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV
$82.91Consumer Defensive
CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company
$89.45Consumer Defensive
Total return — BUD vs CL
growth of $100 · last 17yBUD +115.4%CL +148.0%CL compounded faster
BUD CL
BUD vs CL: by the numbers
- •BUD is the larger company ($160.41B vs $71.58B market cap).
- •BUD trades at the lower earnings multiple (13.57 vs 34.75 P/E).
- •BUD converts more revenue to profit (10.14% vs 10.04% net margin).
- •CL grew revenue faster over the past five years (4.46% vs 3.94% CAGR).
- •CL pays the higher dividend yield (2.34% vs 1.63%).
Which is better, BUD or CL?
Metric tally: BUD 9 · CL 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueBUD(lower P/E)
GrowthCL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeCL(higher dividend yield)
QualityCL(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | BUD | CL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 13.57● | 34.75 |
| Forward P/E | 17.10● | 22.22 |
| P/S ratio | 1.36● | 3.46 |
| P/B ratio | 1.88● | 496.66 |
| PEG ratio | 1.00 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.41● | 21.17 |
| FCF yield | 13.64%● | 5.23% |
Profitability
| Metric | BUD | CL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 55.67% | 60.06%● |
| Operating margin | 31.82%● | 21.21% |
| Net margin | 10.14% | 10.04% |
| ROE | 13.99% | 1439.31%● |
| ROIC | 6.32% | 30.34%● |
Dividends
| Metric | BUD | CL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.63% | 2.34%● |
| Payout ratio | 38.95% | 79.17% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BUD | CL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.94% | 4.46%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 37.66%● | -3.47% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 10.48%● | 3.88% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 2.64% | 3.78%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BUD or CL?
- It depends on your goal. value: BUD (lower P/E); growth: CL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: CL (higher dividend yield); quality: CL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, BUD leads 9 to 6.
- Is BUD or CL cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, BUD is cheaper: BUD trades at a 13.57 P/E and CL at 34.75.
- Which has grown faster, BUD or CL?
- Over the past five years, CL grew revenue faster — BUD at a 3.94% CAGR versus CL at 4.46%.
- Does BUD or CL pay a bigger dividend?
- BUD yields 1.63% and CL yields 2.34% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BUD or CL more profitable?
- BUD runs the higher net margin — BUD at 10.14% versus CL at 10.04%.
- Which has been the better investment, BUD or CL?
- Over the past 10-year, CL delivered the higher annualized total return — BUD at -2.09% versus CL at 4.61%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV P/E ratioColgate-Palmolive P/E ratioAnheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV dividend yieldColgate-Palmolive dividend yieldAnheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV ROEColgate-Palmolive ROEAnheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV operating marginColgate-Palmolive operating marginAnheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV revenue growthColgate-Palmolive revenue growthAnheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV free cash flowColgate-Palmolive free cash flow
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV & Colgate-Palmolive appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.