Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) vs The Procter & Gamble Company (PG)
PG leads on 10 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and The Procter & Gamble Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
$511.57Technology
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
$149.61Consumer Defensive
Total return — AMD vs PG
growth of $100 · last 30yAMD +6245.1%PG +580.4%AMD compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
AMD PG
AMD vs PG: by the numbers
- •AMD is the larger company ($834.17B vs $348.38B market cap).
- •PG trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.87 vs 167.18 P/E).
- •PG converts more revenue to profit (19.22% vs 13.37% net margin).
- •AMD grew revenue faster over the past five years (26.80% vs 2.98% CAGR).
- •PG pays a dividend (2.85% yield) while AMD does not currently pay one.
Which is better, AMD or PG?
Metric tally: AMD 4 · PG 10It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValuePG(lower P/E)
GrowthAMD(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityPG(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AMD | PG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 167.18 | 21.87● |
| Forward P/E | — | 21.17 |
| P/S ratio | 22.54 | 4.17● |
| P/B ratio | 13.09 | 6.63● |
| PEG ratio | 0.49● | 3.09 |
| EV / EBITDA | 104.18 | 16.03● |
| FCF yield | 1.02% | 4.16%● |
Profitability
| Metric | AMD | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 50.28% | 50.33% |
| Operating margin | 11.65% | 23.24%● |
| Net margin | 13.37% | 19.22%● |
| ROE | 7.77% | 30.58%● |
| ROIC | 5.40% | 16.47%● |
Dividends
| Metric | AMD | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 2.85% |
| Payout ratio | — | 63.85% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AMD | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 26.80%● | 2.98% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 4.92% | 5.39%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 37.73%● | -1.64% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 44.44%● | 4.73% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AMD or PG?
- It depends on your goal. value: PG (lower P/E); growth: AMD (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: PG (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, PG leads 10 to 4.
- Is AMD or PG cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, PG is cheaper: AMD trades at a 167.18 P/E and PG at 21.87.
- Which has grown faster, AMD or PG?
- Over the past five years, AMD grew revenue faster — AMD at a 26.80% CAGR versus PG at 2.98%.
- Does AMD or PG pay a bigger dividend?
- PG pays a dividend (2.85% yield) while AMD does not currently pay one.
- Is AMD or PG more profitable?
- PG runs the higher net margin — AMD at 13.37% versus PG at 19.22%.
- Which has been the better investment, AMD or PG?
- Over the past 10-year, AMD delivered the higher annualized total return — AMD at 61.16% versus PG at 8.98%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Advanced Micro Devices P/E ratioProcter & Gamble P/E ratioAdvanced Micro Devices dividend yieldProcter & Gamble dividend yieldAdvanced Micro Devices ROEProcter & Gamble ROEAdvanced Micro Devices operating marginProcter & Gamble operating marginAdvanced Micro Devices revenue growthProcter & Gamble revenue growthAdvanced Micro Devices free cash flowProcter & Gamble free cash flow
Advanced Micro Devices & Procter & Gamble appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.