Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) vs Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB)
A side-by-side comparison of Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and Kimberly-Clark Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: AMD is classified in Technology; KMB is classified in Consumer Defensive. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
$516.13TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
$98.15Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — AMD vs KMB
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yAMD +7262.6% (+53.7%/yr)KMB +15.5% (+1.4%/yr)AMD compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
AMD KMB
AMD vs KMB: by the numbers
- •AMD is the larger company ($841.60B vs $32.58B market cap).
- •KMB trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (16.69 vs 132.34 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •AMD converts more revenue to profit (15.58% vs 11.80% net margin).
- •AMD grew revenue faster over the past five years (25.35% vs -2.69% CAGR).
- •KMB pays a dividend (5.18% yield), while AMD is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AMD | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 132.34 | 16.69 |
| Forward P/E | 68.36 | 13.18 |
| P/S ratio | 20.38 | 1.97 |
| P/B ratio | 12.52 | 18.62 |
| EV / EBITDA | 88.36 | 14.44 |
| FCF yield | 1.00% | 5.40% |
Profitability
| Metric | AMD | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 53.20% | 36.69% |
| Operating margin | 15.71% | 12.38% |
| Net margin | 15.58% | 11.80% |
| ROE | 9.57% | 111.71% |
| ROIC | 7.58% | 12.46% |
Dividends
| Metric | AMD | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 5.18% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 86.73% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AMD | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 25.35% | -2.69% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 4.92% | -2.50% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 27.78% | -8.19% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 36.78% | -2.69% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, AMD or KMB?
- KMB has the lower trailing P/E: AMD trades at 132.34 and KMB at 16.69. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, AMD or KMB?
- Over the past five years, AMD grew revenue faster — AMD at a 25.35% CAGR versus KMB at -2.69%.
- Does AMD or KMB pay a bigger dividend?
- KMB pays a dividend (5.18% yield), while AMD is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
- Is AMD or KMB more profitable?
- AMD runs the higher net margin — AMD at 15.58% versus KMB at 11.80%.
- How have AMD and KMB total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, AMD delivered 55.99% and KMB delivered 1.35% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Advanced Micro Devices P/E ratioKimberly-Clark P/E ratioKimberly-Clark dividend yieldAdvanced Micro Devices ROEKimberly-Clark ROEAdvanced Micro Devices operating marginKimberly-Clark operating marginAdvanced Micro Devices revenue growthKimberly-Clark revenue growthAdvanced Micro Devices free cash flowKimberly-Clark free cash flow
Advanced Micro Devices & Kimberly-Clark appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.