The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM)
A side-by-side comparison of The Procter & Gamble Company and QUALCOMM Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: PG is classified in Consumer Defensive; QCOM is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
$145.27Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
$181.97TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — PG vs QCOM
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yPG +112.8% (+7.8%/yr)QCOM +266.6% (+13.9%/yr)QCOM compounded faster over this window
PG QCOM
PG vs QCOM: by the numbers
- •PG is the larger company ($345.34B vs $191.07B market cap).
- •QCOM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (20.77 vs 21.94 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •QCOM converts more revenue to profit (21.01% vs 18.44% net margin).
- •QCOM grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.23% vs 2.72% CAGR).
- •PG pays the higher dividend yield (3.01% vs 2.05%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | PG | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 21.94 | 20.77 |
| Forward P/E | 20.82 | 17.26 |
| P/S ratio | 3.97 | 4.34 |
| P/B ratio | 6.36 | 6.91 |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.17 | 17.11 |
| FCF yield | 4.61% | 5.45% |
Profitability
| Metric | PG | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 50.18% | 54.23% |
| Operating margin | 22.69% | 23.19% |
| Net margin | 18.44% | 21.01% |
| ROE | 29.54% | 33.48% |
| ROIC | 15.78% | 17.42% |
Dividends
| Metric | PG | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.01% | 2.05% |
| Payout ratio | 64.81% | 41.32% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | PG | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 2.72% | 6.23% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 3.48% | 2.02% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 0.42% | 2.09% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 2.41% | 6.80% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, PG or QCOM?
- QCOM has the lower trailing P/E: PG trades at 21.94 and QCOM at 20.77. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, PG or QCOM?
- Over the past five years, QCOM grew revenue faster — PG at a 2.72% CAGR versus QCOM at 6.23%.
- Does PG or QCOM pay a bigger dividend?
- PG yields 3.01% and QCOM yields 2.05% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is PG or QCOM more profitable?
- QCOM runs the higher net margin — PG at 18.44% versus QCOM at 21.01%.
- How have PG and QCOM total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, PG delivered 8.07% and QCOM delivered 14.33% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Procter & Gamble P/E ratioQUALCOMM P/E ratioProcter & Gamble dividend yieldQUALCOMM dividend yieldProcter & Gamble ROEQUALCOMM ROEProcter & Gamble operating marginQUALCOMM operating marginProcter & Gamble revenue growthQUALCOMM revenue growthProcter & Gamble free cash flowQUALCOMM free cash flow
Procter & Gamble & QUALCOMM appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.