Is PG or QCOM cheaper?

On trailing earnings, PG is cheaper: PG trades at a 21.87 P/E and QCOM at 22.72.

Which has grown faster, PG or QCOM?

Over the past five years, QCOM grew revenue faster — PG at a 2.98% CAGR versus QCOM at 8.63%.

Does PG or QCOM pay a bigger dividend?

PG yields 2.85% and QCOM yields 1.70% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is PG or QCOM more profitable?

QCOM runs the higher net margin — PG at 19.22% versus QCOM at 22.31%.

Which has been the better investment, PG or QCOM?

Over the past 10-year, QCOM delivered the higher annualized total return — PG at 8.98% versus QCOM at 17.83%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM leads on 10 of 17 compared metrics, though PG is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of The Procter & Gamble Company and QUALCOMM Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

The Procter & Gamble Company

$348.38B

$149.61Consumer Defensive

QCOM

QUALCOMM Incorporated

$223.15B

$211.72Technology

Total return — PG vs QCOM

growth of $100 · last 30y

PG +580.4%QCOM +7150.7%QCOM compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

PG QCOM

PG vs QCOM: by the numbers

•PG is the larger company ($348.38B vs $223.15B market cap).
•PG trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.87 vs 22.72 P/E).
•QCOM converts more revenue to profit (22.31% vs 19.22% net margin).
•QCOM grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.63% vs 2.98% CAGR).
•PG pays the higher dividend yield (2.85% vs 1.70%).

Which is better, PG or QCOM?

Metric tally: PG 7 · QCOM 10

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValuePG(lower P/E)

GrowthQCOM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomePG(higher dividend yield)

QualityPG(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	PG	QCOM
P/E ratio	21.87●	22.72
Forward P/E	21.17	19.72●
P/S ratio	4.17●	5.10
P/B ratio	6.63●	8.32
PEG ratio	3.09●	3.96
EV / EBITDA	16.03●	16.71
FCF yield	4.16%	5.51%●

Profitability

Metric	PG	QCOM
Gross margin	50.33%	54.80%●
Operating margin	23.24%	25.52%●
Net margin	19.22%	22.31%●
ROE	30.58%	36.38%●
ROIC	16.47%●	13.15%

Dividends

Metric	PG	QCOM
Dividend yield	2.85%●	1.70%
Payout ratio	63.85%	70.95%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	PG	QCOM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	2.98%	8.63%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	5.39%	5.74%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-1.64%	9.39%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	4.73%	11.87%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, PG or QCOM?: It depends on your goal. value: PG (lower P/E); growth: QCOM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: PG (higher dividend yield); quality: PG (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, QCOM leads 10 to 7.
Is PG or QCOM cheaper?: On trailing earnings, PG is cheaper: PG trades at a 21.87 P/E and QCOM at 22.72.
Which has grown faster, PG or QCOM?: Over the past five years, QCOM grew revenue faster — PG at a 2.98% CAGR versus QCOM at 8.63%.
Does PG or QCOM pay a bigger dividend?: PG yields 2.85% and QCOM yields 1.70% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is PG or QCOM more profitable?: QCOM runs the higher net margin — PG at 19.22% versus QCOM at 22.31%.
Which has been the better investment, PG or QCOM?: Over the past 10-year, QCOM delivered the higher annualized total return — PG at 8.98% versus QCOM at 17.83%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.