Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM)
KMB and QCOM are evenly matched — 8 metrics each of 16.
A side-by-side comparison of Kimberly-Clark Corporation and QUALCOMM Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
$102.29Consumer Defensive
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
$211.72Technology
Total return — KMB vs QCOM
growth of $100 · last 30yKMB +195.9%QCOM +7150.7%QCOM compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
KMB QCOM
KMB vs QCOM: by the numbers
- •QCOM is the larger company ($223.15B vs $33.95B market cap).
- •KMB trades at the lower earnings multiple (16.06 vs 22.72 P/E).
- •QCOM converts more revenue to profit (22.31% vs 12.81% net margin).
- •QCOM grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.63% vs -2.61% CAGR).
- •KMB pays the higher dividend yield (4.97% vs 1.70%).
Which is better, KMB or QCOM?
Metric tally: KMB 8 · QCOM 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueKMB(lower P/E)
GrowthQCOM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeKMB(higher dividend yield)
QualityKMB(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | KMB | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 16.06● | 22.72 |
| Forward P/E | 13.49● | 19.72 |
| P/S ratio | 2.06● | 5.10 |
| P/B ratio | 18.98 | 8.32● |
| PEG ratio | — | 3.96 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.26● | 16.71 |
| FCF yield | 7.56%● | 5.51% |
Profitability
| Metric | KMB | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 35.86% | 54.80%● |
| Operating margin | 13.27% | 25.52%● |
| Net margin | 12.81% | 22.31%● |
| ROE | 117.98%● | 36.38% |
| ROIC | 17.62%● | 13.15% |
Dividends
| Metric | KMB | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4.97%● | 1.70% |
| Payout ratio | 83.55% | 70.95% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | KMB | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -2.61% | 8.63%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -2.50% | 5.74%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 3.38% | 9.39%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -0.94% | 11.87%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, KMB or QCOM?
- It depends on your goal. value: KMB (lower P/E); growth: QCOM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: KMB (higher dividend yield); quality: KMB (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
- Is KMB or QCOM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, KMB is cheaper: KMB trades at a 16.06 P/E and QCOM at 22.72.
- Which has grown faster, KMB or QCOM?
- Over the past five years, QCOM grew revenue faster — KMB at a -2.61% CAGR versus QCOM at 8.63%.
- Does KMB or QCOM pay a bigger dividend?
- KMB yields 4.97% and QCOM yields 1.70% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is KMB or QCOM more profitable?
- QCOM runs the higher net margin — KMB at 12.81% versus QCOM at 22.31%.
- Which has been the better investment, KMB or QCOM?
- Over the past 10-year, QCOM delivered the higher annualized total return — KMB at 1.05% versus QCOM at 17.83%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Kimberly-Clark P/E ratioQUALCOMM P/E ratioKimberly-Clark dividend yieldQUALCOMM dividend yieldKimberly-Clark ROEQUALCOMM ROEKimberly-Clark operating marginQUALCOMM operating marginKimberly-Clark revenue growthQUALCOMM revenue growthKimberly-Clark free cash flowQUALCOMM free cash flow
Kimberly-Clark & QUALCOMM appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.