Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM)
A side-by-side comparison of Kimberly-Clark Corporation and QUALCOMM Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: KMB is classified in Consumer Defensive; QCOM is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
$98.15Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
$181.97TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — KMB vs QCOM
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yKMB +25.0% (+2.3%/yr)QCOM +266.6% (+13.9%/yr)QCOM compounded faster over this window
KMB QCOM
KMB vs QCOM: by the numbers
- •QCOM is the larger company ($191.07B vs $32.58B market cap).
- •KMB trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (16.69 vs 20.77 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •QCOM converts more revenue to profit (21.01% vs 11.80% net margin).
- •QCOM grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.23% vs -2.69% CAGR).
- •KMB pays the higher dividend yield (5.18% vs 2.05%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | KMB | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 16.69 | 20.77 |
| Forward P/E | 13.18 | 17.26 |
| P/S ratio | 1.97 | 4.34 |
| P/B ratio | 18.62 | 6.91 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.44 | 17.11 |
| FCF yield | 5.40% | 5.45% |
Profitability
| Metric | KMB | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 36.69% | 54.23% |
| Operating margin | 12.38% | 23.19% |
| Net margin | 11.80% | 21.01% |
| ROE | 111.71% | 33.48% |
| ROIC | 12.46% | 17.42% |
Dividends
| Metric | KMB | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 5.18% | 2.05% |
| Payout ratio | 86.73% | 41.32% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | KMB | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -2.69% | 6.23% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -2.50% | 2.02% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -8.19% | 2.09% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -2.69% | 6.80% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, KMB or QCOM?
- KMB has the lower trailing P/E: KMB trades at 16.69 and QCOM at 20.77. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, KMB or QCOM?
- Over the past five years, QCOM grew revenue faster — KMB at a -2.69% CAGR versus QCOM at 6.23%.
- Does KMB or QCOM pay a bigger dividend?
- KMB yields 5.18% and QCOM yields 2.05% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is KMB or QCOM more profitable?
- QCOM runs the higher net margin — KMB at 11.80% versus QCOM at 21.01%.
- How have KMB and QCOM total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, KMB delivered 1.35% and QCOM delivered 14.33% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Kimberly-Clark P/E ratioQUALCOMM P/E ratioKimberly-Clark dividend yieldQUALCOMM dividend yieldKimberly-Clark ROEQUALCOMM ROEKimberly-Clark operating marginQUALCOMM operating marginKimberly-Clark revenue growthQUALCOMM revenue growthKimberly-Clark free cash flowQUALCOMM free cash flow
Kimberly-Clark & QUALCOMM appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.