Is NVDA or WFC cheaper?

On trailing earnings, WFC is cheaper: NVDA trades at a 31.42 P/E and WFC at 12.82.

Which has grown faster, NVDA or WFC?

Over the past five years, NVDA grew revenue faster — NVDA at a 68.23% CAGR versus WFC at 9.46%.

Does NVDA or WFC pay a bigger dividend?

NVDA yields 0.01% and WFC yields 2.15% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is NVDA or WFC more profitable?

NVDA runs the higher net margin — NVDA at 62.97% versus WFC at 17.29%.

Which has been the better investment, NVDA or WFC?

Over the past 10-year, NVDA delivered the higher annualized total return — NVDA at 68.06% versus WFC at 8.61%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) vs Wells Fargo & Company (WFC)

NVDA leads on 9 of 14 compared metrics, though WFC is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of NVIDIA Corporation and Wells Fargo & Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Wells Fargo & Company

$256.26B

$83.73Financial Services

Total return — NVDA vs WFC

growth of $100 · last 27y

NVDA +500157.2%WFC +355.5%NVDA compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

NVDA WFC

NVDA vs WFC: by the numbers

•NVDA is the larger company ($4.97T vs $256.26B market cap).
•WFC trades at the lower earnings multiple (12.82 vs 31.42 P/E).
•NVDA converts more revenue to profit (62.97% vs 17.29% net margin).
•NVDA grew revenue faster over the past five years (68.23% vs 9.46% CAGR).
•WFC pays the higher dividend yield (2.15% vs 0.01%).

Which is better, NVDA or WFC?

Metric tally: NVDA 9 · WFC 5

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueWFC(lower P/E)

GrowthNVDA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeWFC(higher dividend yield)

QualityNVDA(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	NVDA	WFC
P/E ratio	31.42	12.82●
Forward P/E	16.44	11.96●
P/S ratio	19.74	2.14●
P/B ratio	25.60	1.51●
PEG ratio	0.57●	0.79
EV / EBITDA	25.96	—
FCF yield	2.38%	—

Profitability

Metric	NVDA	WFC
Gross margin	74.15%●	64.55%
Operating margin	64.02%●	20.47%
Net margin	62.97%●	17.29%
ROE	81.65%●	12.18%
ROIC	62.88%●	3.16%

Dividends

Metric	NVDA	WFC
Dividend yield	0.01%	2.15%●
Payout ratio	0.61%	28.17%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	NVDA	WFC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	68.23%●	9.46%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	85.78%●	72.38%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	85.52%	—
Total return CAGR (5Y)	63.05%●	15.64%

Frequently asked

Which is better, NVDA or WFC?: It depends on your goal. value: WFC (lower P/E); growth: NVDA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: WFC (higher dividend yield); quality: NVDA (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NVDA leads 9 to 5.
Is NVDA or WFC cheaper?: On trailing earnings, WFC is cheaper: NVDA trades at a 31.42 P/E and WFC at 12.82.
Which has grown faster, NVDA or WFC?: Over the past five years, NVDA grew revenue faster — NVDA at a 68.23% CAGR versus WFC at 9.46%.
Does NVDA or WFC pay a bigger dividend?: NVDA yields 0.01% and WFC yields 2.15% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is NVDA or WFC more profitable?: NVDA runs the higher net margin — NVDA at 62.97% versus WFC at 17.29%.
Which has been the better investment, NVDA or WFC?: Over the past 10-year, NVDA delivered the higher annualized total return — NVDA at 68.06% versus WFC at 8.61%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.