QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) vs Wells Fargo & Company (WFC)
WFC leads on 10 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of QUALCOMM Incorporated and Wells Fargo & Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
$211.72Technology
WFC
Wells Fargo & Company
$83.73Financial Services
Total return — QCOM vs WFC
growth of $100 · last 30yQCOM +7150.7%WFC +878.2%QCOM compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
QCOM WFC
QCOM vs WFC: by the numbers
- •WFC is the larger company ($256.26B vs $223.15B market cap).
- •WFC trades at the lower earnings multiple (12.82 vs 22.72 P/E).
- •QCOM converts more revenue to profit (22.31% vs 17.29% net margin).
- •WFC grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.46% vs 8.63% CAGR).
- •WFC pays the higher dividend yield (2.15% vs 1.70%).
Which is better, QCOM or WFC?
Metric tally: QCOM 4 · WFC 10It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueWFC(lower P/E)
GrowthWFC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeWFC(higher dividend yield)
QualityQCOM(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | QCOM | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 22.72 | 12.82● |
| Forward P/E | 19.72 | 11.96● |
| P/S ratio | 5.10 | 2.14● |
| P/B ratio | 8.32 | 1.51● |
| PEG ratio | 3.96 | 0.79● |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.71 | — |
| FCF yield | 5.51% | — |
Profitability
| Metric | QCOM | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 54.80% | 64.55%● |
| Operating margin | 25.52%● | 20.47% |
| Net margin | 22.31%● | 17.29% |
| ROE | 36.38%● | 12.18% |
| ROIC | 13.15%● | 3.16% |
Dividends
| Metric | QCOM | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.70% | 2.15%● |
| Payout ratio | 70.95% | 28.17% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | QCOM | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.63% | 9.46%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 5.74% | 72.38%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 9.39% | — |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 11.87% | 15.64%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, QCOM or WFC?
- It depends on your goal. value: WFC (lower P/E); growth: WFC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: WFC (higher dividend yield); quality: QCOM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, WFC leads 10 to 4.
- Is QCOM or WFC cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, WFC is cheaper: QCOM trades at a 22.72 P/E and WFC at 12.82.
- Which has grown faster, QCOM or WFC?
- Over the past five years, WFC grew revenue faster — QCOM at a 8.63% CAGR versus WFC at 9.46%.
- Does QCOM or WFC pay a bigger dividend?
- QCOM yields 1.70% and WFC yields 2.15% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is QCOM or WFC more profitable?
- QCOM runs the higher net margin — QCOM at 22.31% versus WFC at 17.29%.
- Which has been the better investment, QCOM or WFC?
- Over the past 10-year, QCOM delivered the higher annualized total return — QCOM at 17.83% versus WFC at 8.61%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
QUALCOMM P/E ratioWells Fargo & P/E ratioQUALCOMM dividend yieldWells Fargo & dividend yieldQUALCOMM ROEWells Fargo & ROEQUALCOMM operating marginWells Fargo & operating marginQUALCOMM revenue growthWells Fargo & revenue growthQUALCOMM free cash flowWells Fargo & free cash flow
QUALCOMM & Wells Fargo & appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.