Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) vs Wells Fargo & Company (WFC)
AVGO leads on 8 of 14 compared metrics, though WFC is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Broadcom Inc. and Wells Fargo & Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — AVGO vs WFC
growth of $100 · last 17yAVGO +23484.6%WFC +198.8%AVGO compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
AVGO WFC
AVGO vs WFC: by the numbers
- •AVGO is the larger company ($1.82T vs $256.26B market cap).
- •WFC trades at the lower earnings multiple (12.82 vs 63.68 P/E).
- •AVGO converts more revenue to profit (38.85% vs 17.29% net margin).
- •AVGO grew revenue faster over the past five years (24.17% vs 9.46% CAGR).
- •WFC pays the higher dividend yield (2.15% vs 0.65%).
Which is better, AVGO or WFC?
Metric tally: AVGO 8 · WFC 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueWFC(lower P/E)
GrowthAVGO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeWFC(higher dividend yield)
QualityAVGO(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AVGO | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 63.68 | 12.82● |
| Forward P/E | 19.68 | 11.96● |
| P/S ratio | 24.69 | 2.14● |
| P/B ratio | 21.24 | 1.51● |
| PEG ratio | 0.26● | 0.79 |
| EV / EBITDA | 45.41 | — |
| FCF yield | 1.76% | — |
Profitability
| Metric | AVGO | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 66.96%● | 64.55% |
| Operating margin | 43.66%● | 20.47% |
| Net margin | 38.85%● | 17.29% |
| ROE | 33.43%● | 12.18% |
| ROIC | 16.36%● | 3.16% |
Dividends
| Metric | AVGO | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.65% | 2.15%● |
| Payout ratio | 50.51% | 28.17% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AVGO | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 24.17%● | 9.46% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 49.36% | 72.38%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 20.74% | — |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 55.05%● | 15.64% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AVGO or WFC?
- It depends on your goal. value: WFC (lower P/E); growth: AVGO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: WFC (higher dividend yield); quality: AVGO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, AVGO leads 8 to 6.
- Is AVGO or WFC cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, WFC is cheaper: AVGO trades at a 63.68 P/E and WFC at 12.82.
- Which has grown faster, AVGO or WFC?
- Over the past five years, AVGO grew revenue faster — AVGO at a 24.17% CAGR versus WFC at 9.46%.
- Does AVGO or WFC pay a bigger dividend?
- AVGO yields 0.65% and WFC yields 2.15% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is AVGO or WFC more profitable?
- AVGO runs the higher net margin — AVGO at 38.85% versus WFC at 17.29%.
- Which has been the better investment, AVGO or WFC?
- Over the past 10-year, AVGO delivered the higher annualized total return — AVGO at 40.78% versus WFC at 8.61%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Broadcom P/E ratioWells Fargo & P/E ratioBroadcom dividend yieldWells Fargo & dividend yieldBroadcom ROEWells Fargo & ROEBroadcom operating marginWells Fargo & operating marginBroadcom revenue growthWells Fargo & revenue growthBroadcom free cash flowWells Fargo & free cash flow
Broadcom & Wells Fargo & appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.