Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) vs NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)
NVDA leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Micron Technology, Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — MU vs NVDA
growth of $100 · last 27yMU +2684.7%NVDA +500157.2%NVDA compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
MU NVDA
MU vs NVDA: by the numbers
- •NVDA is the larger company ($4.97T vs $1.11T market cap).
- •NVDA trades at the lower earnings multiple (31.42 vs 46.32 P/E).
- •NVDA converts more revenue to profit (62.97% vs 41.49% net margin).
- •NVDA grew revenue faster over the past five years (68.23% vs 20.34% CAGR).
- •MU pays the higher dividend yield (0.05% vs 0.01%).
Which is better, MU or NVDA?
Metric tally: MU 6 · NVDA 10It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueNVDA(lower P/E)
GrowthNVDA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityNVDA(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | MU | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 46.32 | 31.42● |
| Forward P/E | — | 16.44 |
| P/S ratio | 19.25● | 19.74 |
| P/B ratio | 15.44● | 25.60 |
| PEG ratio | 0.02● | 0.57 |
| EV / EBITDA | 30.08 | 25.96● |
| FCF yield | 0.92% | 2.38%● |
Profitability
| Metric | MU | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 58.44% | 74.15%● |
| Operating margin | 48.52% | 64.02%● |
| Net margin | 41.49% | 62.97%● |
| ROE | 33.28% | 81.65%● |
| ROIC | 12.12% | 62.88%● |
Dividends
| Metric | MU | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.05%● | 0.01% |
| Payout ratio | 6.47% | 0.61% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MU | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 20.34% | 68.23%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 5.12% | 85.78%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 140.90%● | 85.52% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 66.18%● | 63.05% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MU or NVDA?
- It depends on your goal. value: NVDA (lower P/E); growth: NVDA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: NVDA (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NVDA leads 10 to 6.
- Is MU or NVDA cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, NVDA is cheaper: MU trades at a 46.32 P/E and NVDA at 31.42.
- Which has grown faster, MU or NVDA?
- Over the past five years, NVDA grew revenue faster — MU at a 20.34% CAGR versus NVDA at 68.23%.
- Does MU or NVDA pay a bigger dividend?
- MU yields 0.05% and NVDA yields 0.01% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is MU or NVDA more profitable?
- NVDA runs the higher net margin — MU at 41.49% versus NVDA at 62.97%.
- Which has been the better investment, MU or NVDA?
- Over the past 10-year, NVDA delivered the higher annualized total return — MU at 55.52% versus NVDA at 68.06%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Micron Technology P/E ratioNVIDIA P/E ratioMicron Technology dividend yieldNVIDIA dividend yieldMicron Technology ROENVIDIA ROEMicron Technology operating marginNVIDIA operating marginMicron Technology revenue growthNVIDIA revenue growthMicron Technology free cash flowNVIDIA free cash flow
Micron Technology & NVIDIA appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.