Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) vs NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)
A side-by-side comparison of Micron Technology, Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
$975.26TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
$218.29TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — MU vs NVDA
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yMU +5793.6% (+50.3%/yr)NVDA +14538.6% (+64.6%/yr)NVDA compounded faster over this window
MU NVDA
MU vs NVDA: by the numbers
- •NVDA is the larger company ($5.29T vs $1.10T market cap).
- •MU trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (22.07 vs 27.60 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •NVDA converts more revenue to profit (63.66% vs 55.91% net margin).
- •NVDA grew revenue faster over the past five years (69.34% vs 29.33% CAGR).
- •NVDA pays the higher dividend yield (0.13% vs 0.05%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MU | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 22.07 | 27.60 |
| Forward P/E | 6.28 | 23.59 |
| P/S ratio | 12.20 | 17.45 |
| P/B ratio | 10.94 | 23.09 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.83 | 26.35 |
| FCF yield | 2.38% | 2.40% |
Profitability
| Metric | MU | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 39.79% | 74.67% |
| Operating margin | 26.41% | 65.21% |
| Net margin | 55.91% | 63.66% |
| ROE | 50.11% | 84.23% |
| ROIC | 44.23% | 59.61% |
Dividends
| Metric | MU | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.05% | 0.13% |
| Payout ratio | 1.20% | 3.54% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MU | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 29.33% | 69.34% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 25.98% | 94.31% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 172.93% | 82.12% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 68.65% | 57.72% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, MU or NVDA?
- MU has the lower trailing P/E: MU trades at 22.07 and NVDA at 27.60. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, MU or NVDA?
- Over the past five years, NVDA grew revenue faster — MU at a 29.33% CAGR versus NVDA at 69.34%.
- Does MU or NVDA pay a bigger dividend?
- MU yields 0.05% and NVDA yields 0.13% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is MU or NVDA more profitable?
- NVDA runs the higher net margin — MU at 55.91% versus NVDA at 63.66%.
- How have MU and NVDA total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, MU delivered 50.50% and NVDA delivered 64.96% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Micron Technology P/E ratioNVIDIA P/E ratioMicron Technology dividend yieldNVIDIA dividend yieldMicron Technology ROENVIDIA ROEMicron Technology operating marginNVIDIA operating marginMicron Technology revenue growthNVIDIA revenue growthMicron Technology free cash flowNVIDIA free cash flow
Micron Technology & NVIDIA appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.