Is MU or QCOM cheaper?

On trailing earnings, QCOM is cheaper: MU trades at a 46.32 P/E and QCOM at 22.72.

Which has grown faster, MU or QCOM?

Over the past five years, MU grew revenue faster — MU at a 20.34% CAGR versus QCOM at 8.63%.

Does MU or QCOM pay a bigger dividend?

MU yields 0.05% and QCOM yields 1.70% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is MU or QCOM more profitable?

MU runs the higher net margin — MU at 41.49% versus QCOM at 22.31%.

Which has been the better investment, MU or QCOM?

Over the past 10-year, MU delivered the higher annualized total return — MU at 55.52% versus QCOM at 17.83%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Micron Technology, Inc. and QUALCOMM Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Micron Technology, Inc.

$1.11T

$981.61Technology

QCOM

QUALCOMM Incorporated

$223.15B

$211.72Technology

Total return — MU vs QCOM

growth of $100 · last 30y

MU +6496.8%QCOM +7028.6%QCOM compounded faster

MU QCOM

MU vs QCOM: by the numbers

•MU is the larger company ($1.11T vs $223.15B market cap).
•QCOM trades at the lower earnings multiple (22.72 vs 46.32 P/E).
•MU converts more revenue to profit (41.49% vs 22.31% net margin).
•MU grew revenue faster over the past five years (20.34% vs 8.63% CAGR).
•QCOM pays the higher dividend yield (1.70% vs 0.05%).

Which is better, MU or QCOM?

Metric tally: MU 7 · QCOM 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueQCOM(lower P/E)

GrowthMU(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeQCOM(higher dividend yield)

QualityQCOM(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	MU	QCOM
P/E ratio	46.32	22.72●
Forward P/E	—	19.72
P/S ratio	19.25	5.10●
P/B ratio	15.44	8.32●
PEG ratio	0.02●	3.96
EV / EBITDA	30.08	16.71●
FCF yield	0.92%	5.51%●

Profitability

Metric	MU	QCOM
Gross margin	58.44%●	54.80%
Operating margin	48.52%●	25.52%
Net margin	41.49%●	22.31%
ROE	33.28%	36.38%●
ROIC	12.12%	13.15%●

Dividends

Metric	MU	QCOM
Dividend yield	0.05%	1.70%●
Payout ratio	6.47%	70.95%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MU	QCOM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	20.34%●	8.63%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	5.12%	5.74%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	140.90%●	9.39%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	66.18%●	11.87%

Frequently asked

Which is better, MU or QCOM?: It depends on your goal. value: QCOM (lower P/E); growth: MU (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: QCOM (higher dividend yield); quality: QCOM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, QCOM leads 9 to 7.
Is MU or QCOM cheaper?: On trailing earnings, QCOM is cheaper: MU trades at a 46.32 P/E and QCOM at 22.72.
Which has grown faster, MU or QCOM?: Over the past five years, MU grew revenue faster — MU at a 20.34% CAGR versus QCOM at 8.63%.
Does MU or QCOM pay a bigger dividend?: MU yields 0.05% and QCOM yields 1.70% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is MU or QCOM more profitable?: MU runs the higher net margin — MU at 41.49% versus QCOM at 22.31%.
Which has been the better investment, MU or QCOM?: Over the past 10-year, MU delivered the higher annualized total return — MU at 55.52% versus QCOM at 17.83%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MU analysis Full QCOM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Micron Technology P/E ratio QUALCOMM P/E ratio Micron Technology dividend yield QUALCOMM dividend yield Micron Technology ROE QUALCOMM ROE Micron Technology operating margin QUALCOMM operating margin Micron Technology revenue growth QUALCOMM revenue growth Micron Technology free cash flow QUALCOMM free cash flow

Micron Technology & QUALCOMM appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.