Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) vs Micron Technology, Inc. (MU)
MU leads on 9 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Broadcom Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — AVGO vs MU
growth of $100 · last 17yAVGO +23197.0%MU +14272.0%AVGO compounded faster
AVGO MU
AVGO vs MU: by the numbers
- •AVGO is the larger company ($1.82T vs $1.11T market cap).
- •MU trades at the lower earnings multiple (46.32 vs 63.68 P/E).
- •MU converts more revenue to profit (41.49% vs 38.85% net margin).
- •AVGO grew revenue faster over the past five years (24.17% vs 20.34% CAGR).
- •AVGO pays the higher dividend yield (0.65% vs 0.05%).
Which is better, AVGO or MU?
Metric tally: AVGO 6 · MU 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMU(lower P/E)
GrowthAVGO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeAVGO(higher dividend yield)
QualityAVGO(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | AVGO | MU |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 63.68 | 46.32● |
| Forward P/E | 19.64 | — |
| P/S ratio | 24.69 | 19.25● |
| P/B ratio | 21.24 | 15.44● |
| PEG ratio | 0.26 | 0.02● |
| EV / EBITDA | 45.41 | 30.08● |
| FCF yield | 1.76%● | 0.92% |
Profitability
| Metric | AVGO | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 66.96%● | 58.44% |
| Operating margin | 43.66% | 48.52%● |
| Net margin | 38.85% | 41.49%● |
| ROE | 33.43% | 33.28% |
| ROIC | 16.36%● | 12.12% |
Dividends
| Metric | AVGO | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.65%● | 0.05% |
| Payout ratio | 50.51% | 6.47% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AVGO | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 24.17%● | 20.34% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 49.36%● | 5.12% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 20.74% | 140.90%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 55.05% | 66.18%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AVGO or MU?
- It depends on your goal. value: MU (lower P/E); growth: AVGO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: AVGO (higher dividend yield); quality: AVGO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MU leads 9 to 6.
- Is AVGO or MU cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MU is cheaper: AVGO trades at a 63.68 P/E and MU at 46.32.
- Which has grown faster, AVGO or MU?
- Over the past five years, AVGO grew revenue faster — AVGO at a 24.17% CAGR versus MU at 20.34%.
- Does AVGO or MU pay a bigger dividend?
- AVGO yields 0.65% and MU yields 0.05% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is AVGO or MU more profitable?
- MU runs the higher net margin — AVGO at 38.85% versus MU at 41.49%.
- Which has been the better investment, AVGO or MU?
- Over the past 10-year, MU delivered the higher annualized total return — AVGO at 40.78% versus MU at 55.52%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Broadcom P/E ratioMicron Technology P/E ratioBroadcom dividend yieldMicron Technology dividend yieldBroadcom ROEMicron Technology ROEBroadcom operating marginMicron Technology operating marginBroadcom revenue growthMicron Technology revenue growthBroadcom free cash flowMicron Technology free cash flow
Broadcom & Micron Technology appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.