Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) vs Micron Technology, Inc. (MU)
META leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Meta Platforms, Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
$566.98Communication Services
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
$981.61Technology
Total return — META vs MU
growth of $100 · last 14yMETA +1566.1%MU +16882.9%MU compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
META MU
META vs MU: by the numbers
- •META is the larger company ($1.44T vs $1.11T market cap).
- •META trades at the lower earnings multiple (20.62 vs 46.32 P/E).
- •MU converts more revenue to profit (41.49% vs 32.84% net margin).
- •MU grew revenue faster over the past five years (20.34% vs 17.89% CAGR).
- •META pays the higher dividend yield (0.37% vs 0.05%).
Which is better, META or MU?
Metric tally: META 9 · MU 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMETA(lower P/E)
GrowthMU(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityMETA(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | META | MU |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 20.62● | 46.32 |
| Forward P/E | 16.20 | — |
| P/S ratio | 6.76● | 19.25 |
| P/B ratio | 5.97● | 15.44 |
| PEG ratio | 1.11 | 0.02● |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.37● | 30.08 |
| FCF yield | 3.32%● | 0.92% |
Profitability
| Metric | META | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 81.94%● | 58.44% |
| Operating margin | 41.21% | 48.52%● |
| Net margin | 32.84% | 41.49%● |
| ROE | 28.97% | 33.28%● |
| ROIC | 17.95%● | 12.12% |
Dividends
| Metric | META | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.37%● | 0.05% |
| Payout ratio | 8.76% | 6.47% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | META | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 17.89% | 20.34%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 18.60%● | 5.12% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 14.84% | 140.90%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 11.51% | 66.18%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, META or MU?
- It depends on your goal. value: META (lower P/E); growth: MU (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: META (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, META leads 9 to 7.
- Is META or MU cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, META is cheaper: META trades at a 20.62 P/E and MU at 46.32.
- Which has grown faster, META or MU?
- Over the past five years, MU grew revenue faster — META at a 17.89% CAGR versus MU at 20.34%.
- Does META or MU pay a bigger dividend?
- META yields 0.37% and MU yields 0.05% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is META or MU more profitable?
- MU runs the higher net margin — META at 32.84% versus MU at 41.49%.
- Which has been the better investment, META or MU?
- Over the past 10-year, MU delivered the higher annualized total return — META at 17.22% versus MU at 55.52%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Meta Platforms P/E ratioMicron Technology P/E ratioMeta Platforms dividend yieldMicron Technology dividend yieldMeta Platforms ROEMicron Technology ROEMeta Platforms operating marginMicron Technology operating marginMeta Platforms revenue growthMicron Technology revenue growthMeta Platforms free cash flowMicron Technology free cash flow
Meta Platforms & Micron Technology appear in these rankings
Fastest Revenue Growth StocksHighest ROE StocksHighest Operating Margin StocksBest 10-Year Total Return Stocks
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.