Which has grown faster, MU or SNAP?

Over the past five years, MU grew revenue faster — MU at a 20.34% CAGR versus SNAP at 16.73%.

Does MU or SNAP pay a bigger dividend?

MU pays a dividend (0.05% yield) while SNAP does not currently pay one.

Is MU or SNAP more profitable?

MU runs the higher net margin — MU at 41.49% versus SNAP at -6.72%.

Which has been the better investment, MU or SNAP?

Over the past 5-year, MU delivered the higher annualized total return — MU at 55.52% versus SNAP at -39.34%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) vs Snap Inc. (SNAP)

MU leads on 7 of 10 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Micron Technology, Inc. and Snap Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Micron Technology, Inc.

$5.26Communication Services

Total return — MU vs SNAP

growth of $100 · last 9y

MU +3738.9%SNAP -80.6%MU compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

MU SNAP

MU vs SNAP: by the numbers

•MU is the larger company ($1.11T vs $8.90B market cap).
•MU is profitable (41.49% net margin) while SNAP runs a net loss (-6.72%).
•MU grew revenue faster over the past five years (20.34% vs 16.73% CAGR).
•MU pays a dividend (0.05% yield) while SNAP does not currently pay one.

Which is better, MU or SNAP?

Metric tally: MU 7 · SNAP 3

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthMU(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityMU(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	MU	SNAP
P/E ratio	46.32	—
Forward P/E	—	42.69
P/S ratio	19.25	1.46●
P/B ratio	15.44	4.26●
PEG ratio	0.02	—
EV / EBITDA	30.08	—
FCF yield	0.92%	6.86%●

Profitability

Metric	MU	SNAP
Gross margin	58.44%●	55.77%
Operating margin	48.52%●	-6.77%
Net margin	41.49%●	-6.72%
ROE	33.28%●	-19.66%
ROIC	12.12%●	-8.20%

Dividends

Metric	MU	SNAP
Dividend yield	0.05%	—
Payout ratio	6.47%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MU	SNAP
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	20.34%●	16.73%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	5.12%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	140.90%	—
Total return CAGR (5Y)	66.18%●	-39.34%

Frequently asked

Which is better, MU or SNAP?: It depends on your goal. growth: MU (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MU (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MU leads 7 to 3.
Which has grown faster, MU or SNAP?: Over the past five years, MU grew revenue faster — MU at a 20.34% CAGR versus SNAP at 16.73%.
Does MU or SNAP pay a bigger dividend?: MU pays a dividend (0.05% yield) while SNAP does not currently pay one.
Is MU or SNAP more profitable?: MU runs the higher net margin — MU at 41.49% versus SNAP at -6.72%.
Which has been the better investment, MU or SNAP?: Over the past 5-year, MU delivered the higher annualized total return — MU at 55.52% versus SNAP at -39.34%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MU analysis Full SNAP analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Micron Technology P/E ratio Snap P/E ratio Micron Technology dividend yield Snap dividend yield Micron Technology ROE Snap ROE Micron Technology operating margin Snap operating margin Micron Technology revenue growth Snap revenue growth Micron Technology free cash flow Snap free cash flow

Micron Technology & Snap appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.