Is MU or PINS cheaper?

On trailing earnings, PINS is cheaper: MU trades at a 46.32 P/E and PINS at 42.44.

Which has grown faster, MU or PINS?

Over the past five years, MU grew revenue faster — MU at a 20.34% CAGR versus PINS at 18.08%.

Does MU or PINS pay a bigger dividend?

MU pays a dividend (0.05% yield) while PINS does not currently pay one.

Is MU or PINS more profitable?

MU runs the higher net margin — MU at 41.49% versus PINS at 7.64%.

Which has been the better investment, MU or PINS?

Over the past 5-year, MU delivered the higher annualized total return — MU at 55.52% versus PINS at -21.58%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) vs Pinterest, Inc. (PINS)

MU leads on 8 of 13 compared metrics, though PINS is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of Micron Technology, Inc. and Pinterest, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Micron Technology, Inc.

$20.21Communication Services

Total return — MU vs PINS

growth of $100 · last 7y

MU +2161.8%PINS -19.1%MU compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

MU PINS

MU vs PINS: by the numbers

•MU is the larger company ($1.11T vs $13.43B market cap).
•PINS trades at the lower earnings multiple (42.44 vs 46.32 P/E).
•MU converts more revenue to profit (41.49% vs 7.64% net margin).
•MU grew revenue faster over the past five years (20.34% vs 18.08% CAGR).
•MU pays a dividend (0.05% yield) while PINS does not currently pay one.

Which is better, MU or PINS?

Metric tally: MU 8 · PINS 5

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValuePINS(lower P/E)

GrowthMU(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityMU(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	MU	PINS
P/E ratio	46.32	42.44●
P/S ratio	19.25	2.94●
P/B ratio	15.44	4.51●
PEG ratio	0.02	—
EV / EBITDA	30.08●	30.93
FCF yield	0.92%	9.38%●

Profitability

Metric	MU	PINS
Gross margin	58.44%	79.86%●
Operating margin	48.52%●	7.36%
Net margin	41.49%●	7.64%
ROE	33.28%●	11.73%
ROIC	12.12%●	5.88%

Dividends

Metric	MU	PINS
Dividend yield	0.05%	—
Payout ratio	6.47%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MU	PINS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	20.34%●	18.08%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	5.12%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	140.90%●	39.27%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	66.18%●	-21.58%

Frequently asked

Which is better, MU or PINS?: It depends on your goal. value: PINS (lower P/E); growth: MU (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MU (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MU leads 8 to 5.
Is MU or PINS cheaper?: On trailing earnings, PINS is cheaper: MU trades at a 46.32 P/E and PINS at 42.44.
Which has grown faster, MU or PINS?: Over the past five years, MU grew revenue faster — MU at a 20.34% CAGR versus PINS at 18.08%.
Does MU or PINS pay a bigger dividend?: MU pays a dividend (0.05% yield) while PINS does not currently pay one.
Is MU or PINS more profitable?: MU runs the higher net margin — MU at 41.49% versus PINS at 7.64%.
Which has been the better investment, MU or PINS?: Over the past 5-year, MU delivered the higher annualized total return — MU at 55.52% versus PINS at -21.58%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MU analysis Full PINS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Micron Technology P/E ratio Pinterest P/E ratio Micron Technology dividend yield Pinterest dividend yield Micron Technology ROE Pinterest ROE Micron Technology operating margin Pinterest operating margin Micron Technology revenue growth Pinterest revenue growth Micron Technology free cash flow Pinterest free cash flow

Micron Technology & Pinterest appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.