Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) vs Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)
NFLX leads on 8 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Micron Technology, Inc. and Netflix, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
$981.61Technology
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
$80.34Communication Services
Total return — MU vs NFLX
growth of $100 · last 24yMU +3939.5%NFLX +67051.5%NFLX compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
MU NFLX
MU vs NFLX: by the numbers
- •MU is the larger company ($1.11T vs $338.30B market cap).
- •NFLX trades at the lower earnings multiple (25.92 vs 46.32 P/E).
- •MU converts more revenue to profit (41.49% vs 28.52% net margin).
- •MU grew revenue faster over the past five years (20.34% vs 12.18% CAGR).
- •MU pays a dividend (0.05% yield) while NFLX does not currently pay one.
Which is better, MU or NFLX?
Metric tally: MU 7 · NFLX 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueNFLX(lower P/E)
GrowthMU(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityNFLX(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | MU | NFLX |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 46.32 | 25.92● |
| Forward P/E | — | 20.96 |
| P/S ratio | 19.25 | 7.36● |
| P/B ratio | 15.44 | 11.09● |
| PEG ratio | 0.02● | 1.33 |
| EV / EBITDA | 30.08 | 10.28● |
| FCF yield | 0.92% | 3.44%● |
Profitability
| Metric | MU | NFLX |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 58.44%● | 49.03% |
| Operating margin | 48.52%● | 29.72% |
| Net margin | 41.49%● | 28.52% |
| ROE | 33.28% | 42.97%● |
| ROIC | 12.12% | 25.22%● |
Dividends
| Metric | MU | NFLX |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.05% | — |
| Payout ratio | 6.47% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MU | NFLX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 20.34%● | 12.18% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 5.12% | 32.58%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 140.90%● | 37.02% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 66.18%● | 10.44% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MU or NFLX?
- It depends on your goal. value: NFLX (lower P/E); growth: MU (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: NFLX (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NFLX leads 8 to 7.
- Is MU or NFLX cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, NFLX is cheaper: MU trades at a 46.32 P/E and NFLX at 25.92.
- Which has grown faster, MU or NFLX?
- Over the past five years, MU grew revenue faster — MU at a 20.34% CAGR versus NFLX at 12.18%.
- Does MU or NFLX pay a bigger dividend?
- MU pays a dividend (0.05% yield) while NFLX does not currently pay one.
- Is MU or NFLX more profitable?
- MU runs the higher net margin — MU at 41.49% versus NFLX at 28.52%.
- Which has been the better investment, MU or NFLX?
- Over the past 10-year, MU delivered the higher annualized total return — MU at 55.52% versus NFLX at 23.95%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Micron Technology P/E ratioNetflix P/E ratioMicron Technology dividend yieldNetflix dividend yieldMicron Technology ROENetflix ROEMicron Technology operating marginNetflix operating marginMicron Technology revenue growthNetflix revenue growthMicron Technology free cash flowNetflix free cash flow
Micron Technology & Netflix appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.