Is KO or NVDA cheaper?

On trailing earnings, KO is cheaper: KO trades at a 25.98 P/E and NVDA at 31.42.

Which has grown faster, KO or NVDA?

Over the past five years, NVDA grew revenue faster — KO at a 8.07% CAGR versus NVDA at 68.23%.

Does KO or NVDA pay a bigger dividend?

KO yields 2.52% and NVDA yields 0.01% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is KO or NVDA more profitable?

NVDA runs the higher net margin — KO at 27.80% versus NVDA at 62.97%.

Which has been the better investment, KO or NVDA?

Over the past 10-year, NVDA delivered the higher annualized total return — KO at 9.41% versus NVDA at 68.06%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) vs NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)

NVDA leads on 11 of 17 compared metrics, though KO is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of The Coca-Cola Company and NVIDIA Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

The Coca-Cola Company

$355.47B

$82.62Consumer Defensive

Total return — KO vs NVDA

growth of $100 · last 27y

KO +171.4%NVDA +500157.2%NVDA compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

KO NVDA

KO vs NVDA: by the numbers

•NVDA is the larger company ($4.97T vs $355.47B market cap).
•KO trades at the lower earnings multiple (25.98 vs 31.42 P/E).
•NVDA converts more revenue to profit (62.97% vs 27.80% net margin).
•NVDA grew revenue faster over the past five years (68.23% vs 8.07% CAGR).
•KO pays the higher dividend yield (2.52% vs 0.01%).

Which is better, KO or NVDA?

Metric tally: KO 6 · NVDA 11

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueKO(lower P/E)

GrowthNVDA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeKO(higher dividend yield)

QualityNVDA(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	KO	NVDA
P/E ratio	25.98●	31.42
Forward P/E	23.70	16.44●
P/S ratio	7.23●	19.74
P/B ratio	10.60●	25.60
PEG ratio	0.98	0.57●
EV / EBITDA	20.26●	25.96
FCF yield	3.52%●	2.38%

Profitability

Metric	KO	NVDA
Gross margin	61.74%	74.15%●
Operating margin	29.34%	64.02%●
Net margin	27.80%	62.97%●
ROE	40.74%	81.65%●
ROIC	13.00%	62.88%●

Dividends

Metric	KO	NVDA
Dividend yield	2.52%●	0.01%
Payout ratio	68.20%	0.61%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	KO	NVDA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.07%	68.23%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	11.12%	85.78%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	4.97%	85.52%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	11.29%	63.05%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, KO or NVDA?: It depends on your goal. value: KO (lower P/E); growth: NVDA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: KO (higher dividend yield); quality: NVDA (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NVDA leads 11 to 6.
Is KO or NVDA cheaper?: On trailing earnings, KO is cheaper: KO trades at a 25.98 P/E and NVDA at 31.42.
Which has grown faster, KO or NVDA?: Over the past five years, NVDA grew revenue faster — KO at a 8.07% CAGR versus NVDA at 68.23%.
Does KO or NVDA pay a bigger dividend?: KO yields 2.52% and NVDA yields 0.01% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is KO or NVDA more profitable?: NVDA runs the higher net margin — KO at 27.80% versus NVDA at 62.97%.
Which has been the better investment, KO or NVDA?: Over the past 10-year, NVDA delivered the higher annualized total return — KO at 9.41% versus NVDA at 68.06%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.