Is NVDA or STZ cheaper?

On trailing earnings, STZ is cheaper: NVDA trades at a 31.42 P/E and STZ at 15.49.

Which has grown faster, NVDA or STZ?

Over the past five years, NVDA grew revenue faster — NVDA at a 68.23% CAGR versus STZ at 1.19%.

Does NVDA or STZ pay a bigger dividend?

NVDA yields 0.01% and STZ yields 2.75% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is NVDA or STZ more profitable?

NVDA runs the higher net margin — NVDA at 62.97% versus STZ at 18.46%.

Which has been the better investment, NVDA or STZ?

Over the past 10-year, NVDA delivered the higher annualized total return — NVDA at 68.06% versus STZ at 1.25%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) vs Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)

NVDA leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics, though STZ is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of NVIDIA Corporation and Constellation Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Constellation Brands, Inc.

$25.47B

$148.51Consumer Defensive

Total return — NVDA vs STZ

growth of $100 · last 27y

NVDA +500157.2%STZ +1965.5%NVDA compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

NVDA STZ

NVDA vs STZ: by the numbers

•NVDA is the larger company ($4.97T vs $25.47B market cap).
•STZ trades at the lower earnings multiple (15.49 vs 31.42 P/E).
•NVDA converts more revenue to profit (62.97% vs 18.46% net margin).
•NVDA grew revenue faster over the past five years (68.23% vs 1.19% CAGR).
•STZ pays the higher dividend yield (2.75% vs 0.01%).

Which is better, NVDA or STZ?

Metric tally: NVDA 9 · STZ 7

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueSTZ(lower P/E)

GrowthNVDA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeSTZ(higher dividend yield)

QualityNVDA(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	NVDA	STZ
P/E ratio	31.42	15.49●
Forward P/E	16.44	11.90●
P/S ratio	19.74	2.82●
P/B ratio	25.60	3.19●
PEG ratio	0.57	—
EV / EBITDA	25.96	11.70●
FCF yield	2.38%	6.95%●

Profitability

Metric	NVDA	STZ
Gross margin	74.15%●	51.67%
Operating margin	64.02%●	31.33%
Net margin	62.97%●	18.46%
ROE	81.65%●	20.87%
ROIC	62.88%●	10.48%

Dividends

Metric	NVDA	STZ
Dividend yield	0.01%	2.75%●
Payout ratio	0.61%	42.52%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	NVDA	STZ
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	68.23%●	1.19%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	85.78%●	-1.59%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	85.52%●	-1.57%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	63.05%●	-7.36%

Frequently asked

Which is better, NVDA or STZ?: It depends on your goal. value: STZ (lower P/E); growth: NVDA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: STZ (higher dividend yield); quality: NVDA (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NVDA leads 9 to 7.
Is NVDA or STZ cheaper?: On trailing earnings, STZ is cheaper: NVDA trades at a 31.42 P/E and STZ at 15.49.
Which has grown faster, NVDA or STZ?: Over the past five years, NVDA grew revenue faster — NVDA at a 68.23% CAGR versus STZ at 1.19%.
Does NVDA or STZ pay a bigger dividend?: NVDA yields 0.01% and STZ yields 2.75% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is NVDA or STZ more profitable?: NVDA runs the higher net margin — NVDA at 62.97% versus STZ at 18.46%.
Which has been the better investment, NVDA or STZ?: Over the past 10-year, NVDA delivered the higher annualized total return — NVDA at 68.06% versus STZ at 1.25%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.