Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) vs Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)
AVGO leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics, though STZ is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Broadcom Inc. and Constellation Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
$382.07Technology
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
$148.51Consumer Defensive
Total return — AVGO vs STZ
growth of $100 · last 17yAVGO +23484.6%STZ +957.8%AVGO compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
AVGO STZ
AVGO vs STZ: by the numbers
- •AVGO is the larger company ($1.82T vs $25.47B market cap).
- •STZ trades at the lower earnings multiple (15.49 vs 63.68 P/E).
- •AVGO converts more revenue to profit (38.85% vs 18.46% net margin).
- •AVGO grew revenue faster over the past five years (24.17% vs 1.19% CAGR).
- •STZ pays the higher dividend yield (2.75% vs 0.65%).
Which is better, AVGO or STZ?
Metric tally: AVGO 9 · STZ 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSTZ(lower P/E)
GrowthAVGO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeSTZ(higher dividend yield)
QualityAVGO(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AVGO | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 63.68 | 15.49● |
| Forward P/E | 19.68 | 11.90● |
| P/S ratio | 24.69 | 2.82● |
| P/B ratio | 21.24 | 3.19● |
| PEG ratio | 0.26 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 45.41 | 11.70● |
| FCF yield | 1.76% | 6.95%● |
Profitability
| Metric | AVGO | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 66.96%● | 51.67% |
| Operating margin | 43.66%● | 31.33% |
| Net margin | 38.85%● | 18.46% |
| ROE | 33.43%● | 20.87% |
| ROIC | 16.36%● | 10.48% |
Dividends
| Metric | AVGO | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.65% | 2.75%● |
| Payout ratio | 50.51% | 42.52% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AVGO | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 24.17%● | 1.19% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 49.36%● | -1.59% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 20.74%● | -1.57% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 55.05%● | -7.36% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AVGO or STZ?
- It depends on your goal. value: STZ (lower P/E); growth: AVGO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: STZ (higher dividend yield); quality: AVGO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, AVGO leads 9 to 7.
- Is AVGO or STZ cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, STZ is cheaper: AVGO trades at a 63.68 P/E and STZ at 15.49.
- Which has grown faster, AVGO or STZ?
- Over the past five years, AVGO grew revenue faster — AVGO at a 24.17% CAGR versus STZ at 1.19%.
- Does AVGO or STZ pay a bigger dividend?
- AVGO yields 0.65% and STZ yields 2.75% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is AVGO or STZ more profitable?
- AVGO runs the higher net margin — AVGO at 38.85% versus STZ at 18.46%.
- Which has been the better investment, AVGO or STZ?
- Over the past 10-year, AVGO delivered the higher annualized total return — AVGO at 40.78% versus STZ at 1.25%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Broadcom P/E ratioConstellation Brands P/E ratioBroadcom dividend yieldConstellation Brands dividend yieldBroadcom ROEConstellation Brands ROEBroadcom operating marginConstellation Brands operating marginBroadcom revenue growthConstellation Brands revenue growthBroadcom free cash flowConstellation Brands free cash flow
Broadcom & Constellation Brands appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.