QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) vs Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)
A side-by-side comparison of QUALCOMM Incorporated and Constellation Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: QCOM is classified in Technology; STZ is classified in Consumer Defensive. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
$181.97TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
$122.45Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — QCOM vs STZ
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yQCOM +266.6% (+13.9%/yr)STZ -13.2% (-1.4%/yr)QCOM compounded faster over this window
QCOM STZ
QCOM vs STZ: by the numbers
- •QCOM is the larger company ($191.07B vs $20.91B market cap).
- •STZ trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (11.68 vs 20.77 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •QCOM converts more revenue to profit (21.01% vs 20.14% net margin).
- •QCOM grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.23% vs 0.86% CAGR).
- •STZ pays the higher dividend yield (3.37% vs 2.05%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | QCOM | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 20.77 | 11.68 |
| Forward P/E | 17.26 | 10.38 |
| P/S ratio | 4.34 | 2.31 |
| P/B ratio | 6.91 | 2.53 |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.11 | 9.44 |
| FCF yield | 5.45% | 8.77% |
Profitability
| Metric | QCOM | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 54.23% | 52.62% |
| Operating margin | 23.19% | 32.14% |
| Net margin | 21.01% | 20.14% |
| ROE | 33.48% | 22.10% |
| ROIC | 17.42% | 10.85% |
Dividends
| Metric | QCOM | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.05% | 3.37% |
| Payout ratio | 41.32% | 39.12% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | QCOM | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.23% | 0.86% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 2.02% | -1.59% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 2.09% | -1.73% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.80% | -9.18% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, QCOM or STZ?
- STZ has the lower trailing P/E: QCOM trades at 20.77 and STZ at 11.68. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, QCOM or STZ?
- Over the past five years, QCOM grew revenue faster — QCOM at a 6.23% CAGR versus STZ at 0.86%.
- Does QCOM or STZ pay a bigger dividend?
- QCOM yields 2.05% and STZ yields 3.37% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is QCOM or STZ more profitable?
- QCOM runs the higher net margin — QCOM at 21.01% versus STZ at 20.14%.
- How have QCOM and STZ total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, QCOM delivered 14.33% and STZ delivered -1.27% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
QUALCOMM P/E ratioConstellation Brands P/E ratioQUALCOMM dividend yieldConstellation Brands dividend yieldQUALCOMM ROEConstellation Brands ROEQUALCOMM operating marginConstellation Brands operating marginQUALCOMM revenue growthConstellation Brands revenue growthQUALCOMM free cash flowConstellation Brands free cash flow
QUALCOMM & Constellation Brands appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.