Is QCOM or STZ cheaper?

On trailing earnings, STZ is cheaper: QCOM trades at a 22.72 P/E and STZ at 15.49.

Which has grown faster, QCOM or STZ?

Over the past five years, QCOM grew revenue faster — QCOM at a 8.63% CAGR versus STZ at 1.19%.

Does QCOM or STZ pay a bigger dividend?

QCOM yields 1.70% and STZ yields 2.75% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is QCOM or STZ more profitable?

QCOM runs the higher net margin — QCOM at 22.31% versus STZ at 18.46%.

Which has been the better investment, QCOM or STZ?

Over the past 10-year, QCOM delivered the higher annualized total return — QCOM at 17.83% versus STZ at 1.25%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) vs Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)

QCOM and STZ are evenly matched — 8 metrics each of 16.

A side-by-side comparison of QUALCOMM Incorporated and Constellation Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

QCOM

QUALCOMM Incorporated

$223.15B

$211.72Technology

STZ

Constellation Brands, Inc.

$25.47B

$148.51Consumer Defensive

Total return — QCOM vs STZ

growth of $100 · last 30y

QCOM +7150.7%STZ +3669.3%QCOM compounded faster

QCOM STZ

QCOM vs STZ: by the numbers

•QCOM is the larger company ($223.15B vs $25.47B market cap).
•STZ trades at the lower earnings multiple (15.49 vs 22.72 P/E).
•QCOM converts more revenue to profit (22.31% vs 18.46% net margin).
•QCOM grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.63% vs 1.19% CAGR).
•STZ pays the higher dividend yield (2.75% vs 1.70%).

Which is better, QCOM or STZ?

Metric tally: QCOM 8 · STZ 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueSTZ(lower P/E)

GrowthQCOM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeSTZ(higher dividend yield)

QualityQCOM(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	QCOM	STZ
P/E ratio	22.72	15.49●
Forward P/E	19.72	11.90●
P/S ratio	5.10	2.82●
P/B ratio	8.32	3.19●
PEG ratio	3.96	—
EV / EBITDA	16.71	11.70●
FCF yield	5.51%	6.95%●

Profitability

Metric	QCOM	STZ
Gross margin	54.80%●	51.67%
Operating margin	25.52%	31.33%●
Net margin	22.31%●	18.46%
ROE	36.38%●	20.87%
ROIC	13.15%●	10.48%

Dividends

Metric	QCOM	STZ
Dividend yield	1.70%	2.75%●
Payout ratio	70.95%	42.52%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	QCOM	STZ
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.63%●	1.19%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	5.74%●	-1.59%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	9.39%●	-1.57%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	11.87%●	-7.36%

Frequently asked

Which is better, QCOM or STZ?: It depends on your goal. value: STZ (lower P/E); growth: QCOM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: STZ (higher dividend yield); quality: QCOM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
Is QCOM or STZ cheaper?: On trailing earnings, STZ is cheaper: QCOM trades at a 22.72 P/E and STZ at 15.49.
Which has grown faster, QCOM or STZ?: Over the past five years, QCOM grew revenue faster — QCOM at a 8.63% CAGR versus STZ at 1.19%.
Does QCOM or STZ pay a bigger dividend?: QCOM yields 1.70% and STZ yields 2.75% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is QCOM or STZ more profitable?: QCOM runs the higher net margin — QCOM at 22.31% versus STZ at 18.46%.
Which has been the better investment, QCOM or STZ?: Over the past 10-year, QCOM delivered the higher annualized total return — QCOM at 17.83% versus STZ at 1.25%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full QCOM analysis Full STZ analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

QUALCOMM P/E ratio Constellation Brands P/E ratio QUALCOMM dividend yield Constellation Brands dividend yield QUALCOMM ROE Constellation Brands ROE QUALCOMM operating margin Constellation Brands operating margin QUALCOMM revenue growth Constellation Brands revenue growth QUALCOMM free cash flow Constellation Brands free cash flow

QUALCOMM & Constellation Brands appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.