Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) vs Meta Platforms, Inc. (META)
A side-by-side comparison of Kimberly-Clark Corporation and Meta Platforms, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: KMB is classified in Consumer Defensive; META is classified in Communication Services. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
$98.15Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
$648.03Communication ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — KMB vs META
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yKMB +9.6% (+0.9%/yr)META +406.4% (+17.6%/yr)META compounded faster over this window
KMB META
KMB vs META: by the numbers
- •META is the larger company ($1.65T vs $32.58B market cap).
- •KMB trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (16.69 vs 24.42 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •META converts more revenue to profit (29.84% vs 11.80% net margin).
- •META grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.85% vs -2.69% CAGR).
- •KMB pays the higher dividend yield (5.18% vs 0.33%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | KMB | META |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 16.69 | 24.42 |
| Forward P/E | 13.18 | 20.64 |
| P/S ratio | 1.97 | 7.23 |
| P/B ratio | 18.62 | 6.32 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.44 | 15.94 |
| FCF yield | 5.40% | 2.48% |
Profitability
| Metric | KMB | META |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 36.69% | 81.75% |
| Operating margin | 12.38% | 38.08% |
| Net margin | 11.80% | 29.84% |
| ROE | 111.71% | 26.07% |
| ROIC | 12.46% | 17.18% |
Dividends
| Metric | KMB | META |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 5.18% | 0.33% |
| Payout ratio | 86.73% | 7.91% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | KMB | META |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -2.69% | 16.85% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -2.50% | 18.60% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -8.19% | 4.96% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -2.69% | 11.41% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, KMB or META?
- KMB has the lower trailing P/E: KMB trades at 16.69 and META at 24.42. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, KMB or META?
- Over the past five years, META grew revenue faster — KMB at a -2.69% CAGR versus META at 16.85%.
- Does KMB or META pay a bigger dividend?
- KMB yields 5.18% and META yields 0.33% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is KMB or META more profitable?
- META runs the higher net margin — KMB at 11.80% versus META at 29.84%.
- How have KMB and META total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, KMB delivered 1.35% and META delivered 17.72% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Kimberly-Clark P/E ratioMeta Platforms P/E ratioKimberly-Clark dividend yieldMeta Platforms dividend yieldKimberly-Clark ROEMeta Platforms ROEKimberly-Clark operating marginMeta Platforms operating marginKimberly-Clark revenue growthMeta Platforms revenue growthKimberly-Clark free cash flowMeta Platforms free cash flow
Kimberly-Clark & Meta Platforms appear in these rankings
Highest Dividend Yield Stocks25+ Year Dividend GrowersFastest Revenue Growth StocksHighest ROE Stocks
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.