Is COST or NVDA cheaper?

On trailing earnings, NVDA is cheaper: COST trades at a 49.41 P/E and NVDA at 31.42.

Which has grown faster, COST or NVDA?

Over the past five years, NVDA grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus NVDA at 68.23%.

Does COST or NVDA pay a bigger dividend?

COST yields 0.55% and NVDA yields 0.01% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is COST or NVDA more profitable?

NVDA runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus NVDA at 62.97%.

Which has been the better investment, COST or NVDA?

Over the past 10-year, NVDA delivered the higher annualized total return — COST at 21.26% versus NVDA at 68.06%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) vs NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)

NVDA leads on 14 of 17 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Costco Wholesale Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

COST

Costco Wholesale Corporation

$435.65B

$982.35Consumer Defensive

Total return — COST vs NVDA

growth of $100 · last 27y

COST +2643.2%NVDA +500157.2%NVDA compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

COST NVDA

COST vs NVDA: by the numbers

•NVDA is the larger company ($4.97T vs $435.65B market cap).
•NVDA trades at the lower earnings multiple (31.42 vs 49.41 P/E).
•NVDA converts more revenue to profit (62.97% vs 3.01% net margin).
•NVDA grew revenue faster over the past five years (68.23% vs 9.48% CAGR).
•COST pays the higher dividend yield (0.55% vs 0.01%).

Which is better, COST or NVDA?

Metric tally: COST 3 · NVDA 14

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueNVDA(lower P/E)

GrowthNVDA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeCOST(higher dividend yield)

QualityNVDA(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	COST	NVDA
P/E ratio	49.41	31.42●
Forward P/E	43.40	16.44●
P/S ratio	1.49●	19.74
P/B ratio	13.03●	25.60
PEG ratio	5.23	0.57●
EV / EBITDA	29.43	25.96●
FCF yield	2.02%	2.38%●

Profitability

Metric	COST	NVDA
Gross margin	12.88%	74.15%●
Operating margin	3.82%	64.02%●
Net margin	3.01%	62.97%●
ROE	26.38%	81.65%●
ROIC	19.44%	62.88%●

Dividends

Metric	COST	NVDA
Dividend yield	0.55%●	0.01%
Payout ratio	29.44%	0.61%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	COST	NVDA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.48%	68.23%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	15.04%	85.78%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	4.95%	85.52%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	21.56%	63.05%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, COST or NVDA?: It depends on your goal. value: NVDA (lower P/E); growth: NVDA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: COST (higher dividend yield); quality: NVDA (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NVDA leads 14 to 3.
Is COST or NVDA cheaper?: On trailing earnings, NVDA is cheaper: COST trades at a 49.41 P/E and NVDA at 31.42.
Which has grown faster, COST or NVDA?: Over the past five years, NVDA grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus NVDA at 68.23%.
Does COST or NVDA pay a bigger dividend?: COST yields 0.55% and NVDA yields 0.01% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is COST or NVDA more profitable?: NVDA runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus NVDA at 62.97%.
Which has been the better investment, COST or NVDA?: Over the past 10-year, NVDA delivered the higher annualized total return — COST at 21.26% versus NVDA at 68.06%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.