Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) vs Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST)
AMD and COST are evenly matched — 7 metrics each of 14.
A side-by-side comparison of Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
$511.57Technology
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
$982.35Consumer Defensive
Not enough overlapping price history to compare AMD and COST.
AMD vs COST: by the numbers
- •AMD is the larger company ($834.17B vs $435.65B market cap).
- •COST trades at the lower earnings multiple (49.41 vs 167.18 P/E).
- •AMD converts more revenue to profit (13.37% vs 3.01% net margin).
- •AMD grew revenue faster over the past five years (26.80% vs 9.48% CAGR).
- •COST pays a dividend (0.55% yield) while AMD does not currently pay one.
Which is better, AMD or COST?
Metric tally: AMD 7 · COST 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCOST(lower P/E)
GrowthAMD(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityCOST(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | AMD | COST |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 167.18 | 49.41● |
| Forward P/E | — | 43.40 |
| P/S ratio | 22.54 | 1.49● |
| P/B ratio | 13.09 | 13.03 |
| PEG ratio | 0.49● | 5.23 |
| EV / EBITDA | 104.18 | 29.43● |
| FCF yield | 1.02% | 2.02%● |
Profitability
| Metric | AMD | COST |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 50.28%● | 12.88% |
| Operating margin | 11.65%● | 3.82% |
| Net margin | 13.37%● | 3.01% |
| ROE | 7.77% | 26.38%● |
| ROIC | 5.40% | 19.44%● |
Dividends
| Metric | AMD | COST |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 0.55% |
| Payout ratio | — | 29.44% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AMD | COST |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 26.80%● | 9.48% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 4.92% | 15.04%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 37.73%● | 4.95% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 44.44%● | 21.56% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AMD or COST?
- It depends on your goal. value: COST (lower P/E); growth: AMD (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: COST (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
- Is AMD or COST cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, COST is cheaper: AMD trades at a 167.18 P/E and COST at 49.41.
- Which has grown faster, AMD or COST?
- Over the past five years, AMD grew revenue faster — AMD at a 26.80% CAGR versus COST at 9.48%.
- Does AMD or COST pay a bigger dividend?
- COST pays a dividend (0.55% yield) while AMD does not currently pay one.
- Is AMD or COST more profitable?
- AMD runs the higher net margin — AMD at 13.37% versus COST at 3.01%.
- Which has been the better investment, AMD or COST?
- Over the past 10-year, AMD delivered the higher annualized total return — AMD at 61.16% versus COST at 21.26%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Advanced Micro Devices P/E ratioCostco Wholesale P/E ratioAdvanced Micro Devices dividend yieldCostco Wholesale dividend yieldAdvanced Micro Devices ROECostco Wholesale ROEAdvanced Micro Devices operating marginCostco Wholesale operating marginAdvanced Micro Devices revenue growthCostco Wholesale revenue growthAdvanced Micro Devices free cash flowCostco Wholesale free cash flow
Advanced Micro Devices & Costco Wholesale appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.