Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) vs Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST)

A side-by-side comparison of Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 29, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare
Different business models: AMD is classified in Technology; COST is classified in Consumer Defensive. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

Total returnAMD vs COST

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30y
AMD +7398.9%COST +12071.5%COST compounded faster
05k10kStart $100200120062011201620212026$7,499$12,172
AMD COST

AMD vs COST: by the numbers

  • AMD is the larger company ($741.30B vs $428.66B market cap).
  • COST trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (48.62 vs 148.57 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • AMD converts more revenue to profit (13.37% vs 3.01% net margin).
  • AMD grew revenue faster over the past five years (26.80% vs 9.48% CAGR).
  • COST pays a dividend (0.56% yield), while AMD is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricAMDCOST
P/E ratio148.5748.62
Forward P/E60.5947.06
P/S ratio20.031.46
P/B ratio11.6412.82
PEG ratio0.495.23
EV / EBITDA101.3730.37
FCF yield1.14%2.05%

Profitability

MetricAMDCOST
Gross margin50.28%12.88%
Operating margin11.65%3.82%
Net margin13.37%3.01%
ROE7.77%26.38%
ROIC5.40%19.44%

Dividends

MetricAMDCOST
Dividend yieldN/A0.56%
Payout ratioN/A29.44%

Growth (annualized)

MetricAMDCOST
Revenue CAGR (5Y)26.80%9.48%
EPS CAGR (5Y)4.92%15.04%
FCF CAGR (5Y)37.73%4.95%
Total return CAGR (5Y)35.95%18.80%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, AMD or COST?
COST has the lower trailing P/E: AMD trades at 148.57 and COST at 48.62. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, AMD or COST?
Over the past five years, AMD grew revenue faster — AMD at a 26.80% CAGR versus COST at 9.48%.
Does AMD or COST pay a bigger dividend?
COST pays a dividend (0.56% yield), while AMD is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is AMD or COST more profitable?
AMD runs the higher net margin — AMD at 13.37% versus COST at 3.01%.
How have AMD and COST total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, AMD delivered 52.20% and COST delivered 20.24% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 29, 2026.