Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM leads on 12 of 17 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Costco Wholesale Corporation and QUALCOMM Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — COST vs QCOM

growth of $100 · last 30y
COST +9597.4%QCOM +7028.6%COST compounded faster
02k4k6k8k10kStart $100200120062011201620212026$9,697$7,129
COST QCOM

COST vs QCOM: by the numbers

  • COST is the larger company ($435.65B vs $223.15B market cap).
  • QCOM trades at the lower earnings multiple (22.72 vs 49.41 P/E).
  • QCOM converts more revenue to profit (22.31% vs 3.01% net margin).
  • COST grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.48% vs 8.63% CAGR).
  • QCOM pays the higher dividend yield (1.70% vs 0.55%).

Which is better, COST or QCOM?

Metric tally: COST 5 · QCOM 12

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueQCOM(lower P/E)
GrowthCOST(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeQCOM(higher dividend yield)
QualityCOST(higher ROIC)

Valuation

MetricCOSTQCOM
P/E ratio49.4122.72
Forward P/E43.4019.72
P/S ratio1.495.10
P/B ratio13.038.32
PEG ratio5.233.96
EV / EBITDA29.4316.71
FCF yield2.02%5.51%

Profitability

MetricCOSTQCOM
Gross margin12.88%54.80%
Operating margin3.82%25.52%
Net margin3.01%22.31%
ROE26.38%36.38%
ROIC19.44%13.15%

Dividends

MetricCOSTQCOM
Dividend yield0.55%1.70%
Payout ratio29.44%70.95%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCOSTQCOM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)9.48%8.63%
EPS CAGR (5Y)15.04%5.74%
FCF CAGR (5Y)4.95%9.39%
Total return CAGR (5Y)21.56%11.87%

Frequently asked

Which is better, COST or QCOM?
It depends on your goal. value: QCOM (lower P/E); growth: COST (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: QCOM (higher dividend yield); quality: COST (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, QCOM leads 12 to 5.
Is COST or QCOM cheaper?
On trailing earnings, QCOM is cheaper: COST trades at a 49.41 P/E and QCOM at 22.72.
Which has grown faster, COST or QCOM?
Over the past five years, COST grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus QCOM at 8.63%.
Does COST or QCOM pay a bigger dividend?
COST yields 0.55% and QCOM yields 1.70% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is COST or QCOM more profitable?
QCOM runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus QCOM at 22.31%.
Which has been the better investment, COST or QCOM?
Over the past 10-year, COST delivered the higher annualized total return — COST at 21.26% versus QCOM at 17.83%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.