Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)
A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CLS
Celestica Inc.
$350.20TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
$197.02TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CLS vs NVDA
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 28yCLS +2331.1%NVDA +522434.1%NVDA compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CLS NVDA
CLS vs NVDA: by the numbers
- •NVDA is the larger company ($4.77T vs $40.26B market cap).
- •NVDA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (30.09 vs 33.05 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •NVDA converts more revenue to profit (62.97% vs 7.16% net margin).
- •NVDA grew revenue faster over the past five years (68.23% vs 22.80% CAGR).
- •NVDA pays a dividend (0.02% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CLS | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 33.05 | 30.09 |
| Forward P/E | 31.47 | 41.87 |
| P/S ratio | 2.37 | 18.91 |
| P/B ratio | 14.91 | 24.52 |
| PEG ratio | 0.39 | 0.57 |
| EV / EBITDA | 26.58 | 28.96 |
| FCF yield | 1.41% | 2.48% |
Profitability
| Metric | CLS | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 11.59% | 74.15% |
| Operating margin | 8.13% | 64.02% |
| Net margin | 7.16% | 62.97% |
| ROE | 45.07% | 81.65% |
| ROIC | 27.74% | 62.88% |
Dividends
| Metric | CLS | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 0.02% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 0.61% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CLS | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 22.80% | 68.23% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 73.33% | 85.78% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 29.00% | 85.52% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 105.32% | 59.29% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or NVDA?
- NVDA has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 33.05 and NVDA at 30.09. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CLS or NVDA?
- Over the past five years, NVDA grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus NVDA at 68.23%.
- Does CLS or NVDA pay a bigger dividend?
- NVDA pays a dividend (0.02% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CLS or NVDA more profitable?
- NVDA runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus NVDA at 62.97%.
- How have CLS and NVDA total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.11% and NVDA delivered 64.27% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Celestica P/E ratioNVIDIA P/E ratioCelestica dividend yieldNVIDIA dividend yieldCelestica ROENVIDIA ROECelestica operating marginNVIDIA operating marginCelestica revenue growthNVIDIA revenue growthCelestica free cash flowNVIDIA free cash flow
Celestica & NVIDIA appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.