Which has the lower trailing P/E, AMD or CLS?

CLS has the lower trailing P/E: AMD trades at 161.75 and CLS at 33.05. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, AMD or CLS?

Over the past five years, AMD grew revenue faster — AMD at a 26.80% CAGR versus CLS at 22.80%.

Is AMD or CLS more profitable?

AMD runs the higher net margin — AMD at 13.37% versus CLS at 7.16%.

How have AMD and CLS total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, AMD delivered 53.43% and CLS delivered 40.11% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) vs Celestica Inc. (CLS)

A side-by-side comparison of Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and Celestica Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

AMD

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.

$741.30B

$454.62TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

CLS

Celestica Inc.

$40.26B

$350.20TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — AMD vs CLS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 28y

AMD +5437.9%CLS +3522.3%AMD compounded faster

AMD CLS

AMD vs CLS: by the numbers

•AMD is the larger company ($741.30B vs $40.26B market cap).
•CLS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (33.05 vs 161.75 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•AMD converts more revenue to profit (13.37% vs 7.16% net margin).
•AMD grew revenue faster over the past five years (26.80% vs 22.80% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AMD	CLS
P/E ratio	161.75	33.05
Forward P/E	65.96	31.47
P/S ratio	21.80	2.37
P/B ratio	12.67	14.91
PEG ratio	0.49	0.39
EV / EBITDA	110.38	26.58
FCF yield	1.05%	1.41%

Profitability

Metric	AMD	CLS
Gross margin	50.28%	11.59%
Operating margin	11.65%	8.13%
Net margin	13.37%	7.16%
ROE	7.77%	45.07%
ROIC	5.40%	27.74%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AMD	CLS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	26.80%	22.80%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	4.92%	73.33%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	37.73%	29.00%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	40.31%	105.32%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, AMD or CLS?: CLS has the lower trailing P/E: AMD trades at 161.75 and CLS at 33.05. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, AMD or CLS?: Over the past five years, AMD grew revenue faster — AMD at a 26.80% CAGR versus CLS at 22.80%.
Is AMD or CLS more profitable?: AMD runs the higher net margin — AMD at 13.37% versus CLS at 7.16%.
How have AMD and CLS total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, AMD delivered 53.43% and CLS delivered 40.11% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AMD analysis Full CLS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Advanced Micro Devices P/E ratio Celestica P/E ratio Advanced Micro Devices dividend yield Celestica dividend yield Advanced Micro Devices ROE Celestica ROE Advanced Micro Devices operating margin Celestica operating margin Advanced Micro Devices revenue growth Celestica revenue growth Advanced Micro Devices free cash flow Celestica free cash flow

Advanced Micro Devices & Celestica appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.