Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or QCOM?

QCOM has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 33.05 and QCOM at 18.24. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CLS or QCOM?

Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus QCOM at 8.63%.

Does CLS or QCOM pay a bigger dividend?

QCOM pays a dividend (2.11% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is CLS or QCOM more profitable?

QCOM runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus QCOM at 22.31%.

How have CLS and QCOM total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.11% and QCOM delivered 13.58% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM)

A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and QUALCOMM Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CLS

Celestica Inc.

$40.26B

$350.20TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

QCOM

QUALCOMM Incorporated

$171.68B

$162.88TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CLS vs QCOM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 28y

CLS +3522.3%QCOM +8415.2%QCOM compounded faster

CLS QCOM

CLS vs QCOM: by the numbers

•QCOM is the larger company ($171.68B vs $40.26B market cap).
•QCOM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (18.24 vs 33.05 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•QCOM converts more revenue to profit (22.31% vs 7.16% net margin).
•CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 8.63% CAGR).
•QCOM pays a dividend (2.11% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CLS	QCOM
P/E ratio	33.05	18.24
Forward P/E	31.47	15.79
P/S ratio	2.37	4.10
P/B ratio	14.91	6.68
PEG ratio	0.39	3.18
EV / EBITDA	26.58	14.61
FCF yield	1.41%	6.86%

Profitability

Metric	CLS	QCOM
Gross margin	11.59%	54.80%
Operating margin	8.13%	25.52%
Net margin	7.16%	22.31%
ROE	45.07%	36.38%
ROIC	27.74%	13.15%

Dividends

Metric	CLS	QCOM
Dividend yield	N/A	2.11%
Payout ratio	N/A	70.95%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CLS	QCOM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	22.80%	8.63%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	73.33%	5.74%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	29.00%	9.39%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	105.32%	6.10%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or QCOM?: QCOM has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 33.05 and QCOM at 18.24. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CLS or QCOM?: Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus QCOM at 8.63%.
Does CLS or QCOM pay a bigger dividend?: QCOM pays a dividend (2.11% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is CLS or QCOM more profitable?: QCOM runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus QCOM at 22.31%.
How have CLS and QCOM total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.11% and QCOM delivered 13.58% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CLS analysis Full QCOM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Celestica P/E ratio QUALCOMM P/E ratio Celestica dividend yield QUALCOMM dividend yield Celestica ROE QUALCOMM ROE Celestica operating margin QUALCOMM operating margin Celestica revenue growth QUALCOMM revenue growth Celestica free cash flow QUALCOMM free cash flow

Celestica & QUALCOMM appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.