Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM)
A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and QUALCOMM Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CLS
Celestica Inc.
$346.55TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
$181.97TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CLS vs QCOM
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCLS +2914.0% (+40.6%/yr)QCOM +266.6% (+13.9%/yr)CLS compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CLS QCOM
CLS vs QCOM: by the numbers
- •QCOM is the larger company ($191.07B vs $39.85B market cap).
- •QCOM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (20.77 vs 35.99 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •QCOM converts more revenue to profit (21.01% vs 7.16% net margin).
- •CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 6.23% CAGR).
- •QCOM pays a dividend (2.05% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CLS | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 35.99 | 20.77 |
| Forward P/E | 30.38 | 17.26 |
| P/S ratio | 2.55 | 4.34 |
| P/B ratio | 16.07 | 6.91 |
| EV / EBITDA | 27.75 | 17.11 |
| FCF yield | 1.30% | 5.45% |
Profitability
| Metric | CLS | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 11.59% | 54.23% |
| Operating margin | 8.13% | 23.19% |
| Net margin | 7.16% | 21.01% |
| ROE | 45.07% | 33.48% |
| ROIC | 29.75% | 17.42% |
Dividends
| Metric | CLS | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 2.05% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 41.32% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CLS | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 22.80% | 6.23% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 73.33% | 2.02% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 29.00% | 2.09% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 106.10% | 6.80% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or QCOM?
- QCOM has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 35.99 and QCOM at 20.77. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CLS or QCOM?
- Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus QCOM at 6.23%.
- Does CLS or QCOM pay a bigger dividend?
- QCOM pays a dividend (2.05% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CLS or QCOM more profitable?
- QCOM runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus QCOM at 21.01%.
- How have CLS and QCOM total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.78% and QCOM delivered 14.33% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Celestica P/E ratioQUALCOMM P/E ratioQUALCOMM dividend yieldCelestica ROEQUALCOMM ROECelestica operating marginQUALCOMM operating marginCelestica revenue growthQUALCOMM revenue growthCelestica free cash flowQUALCOMM free cash flow
Celestica & QUALCOMM appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.