Apple Inc. (AAPL) vs Philip Morris International Inc. (PM)
PM leads on 11 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Apple Inc. and Philip Morris International Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 27, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
AAPL
Apple Inc.
$283.78Technology
PM
Philip Morris International Inc.
$180.77Consumer Defensive
Total return — AAPL vs PM
growth of $100 · last 18yAAPL +6164.5%PM +266.0%AAPL compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
AAPL PM
AAPL vs PM: by the numbers
- •AAPL is the larger company ($4.17T vs $281.74B market cap).
- •PM trades at the lower earnings multiple (25.42 vs 34.31 P/E).
- •AAPL converts more revenue to profit (27.15% vs 26.74% net margin).
- •PM grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.34% vs 6.76% CAGR).
- •PM pays the higher dividend yield (3.25% vs 0.38%).
Which is better, AAPL or PM?
Metric tally: AAPL 4 · PM 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValuePM(lower P/E)
GrowthPM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomePM(higher dividend yield)
QualityAAPL(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AAPL | PM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 34.31 | 25.42● |
| Forward P/E | 29.42 | 19.81● |
| P/S ratio | 9.28 | 6.81● |
| P/B ratio | 39.35 | — |
| PEG ratio | 1.51 | 0.36● |
| EV / EBITDA | 26.50 | 19.01● |
| FCF yield | 3.08% | 3.78%● |
Profitability
| Metric | AAPL | PM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 47.86% | 67.30%● |
| Operating margin | 32.64% | 36.83%● |
| Net margin | 27.15% | 26.74% |
| ROE | 115.10%● | -113.55% |
| ROIC | 51.97%● | 25.56% |
Dividends
| Metric | AAPL | PM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.38% | 3.25%● |
| Payout ratio | 14.42% | 80.88% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AAPL | PM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.76% | 7.34%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 17.73%● | 7.10% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 7.38%● | 4.58% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 16.93% | 17.89%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AAPL or PM?
- It depends on your goal. value: PM (lower P/E); growth: PM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: PM (higher dividend yield); quality: AAPL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, PM leads 11 to 4.
- Is AAPL or PM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, PM is cheaper: AAPL trades at a 34.31 P/E and PM at 25.42.
- Which has grown faster, AAPL or PM?
- Over the past five years, PM grew revenue faster — AAPL at a 6.76% CAGR versus PM at 7.34%.
- Does AAPL or PM pay a bigger dividend?
- AAPL yields 0.38% and PM yields 3.25% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is AAPL or PM more profitable?
- AAPL runs the higher net margin — AAPL at 27.15% versus PM at 26.74%.
- Which has been the better investment, AAPL or PM?
- Over the past 10-year, AAPL delivered the higher annualized total return — AAPL at 29.57% versus PM at 11.61%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Apple P/E ratioPhilip Morris International P/E ratioApple dividend yieldPhilip Morris International dividend yieldApple ROEPhilip Morris International ROEApple operating marginPhilip Morris International operating marginApple revenue growthPhilip Morris International revenue growthApple free cash flowPhilip Morris International free cash flow
Apple & Philip Morris International appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 27, 2026.