Basis: Latest reported fiscal year. Source: stored company filings and market data; unavailable inputs remain N/A.
The forward PE ratio is N/A as of Sunday, August 23, 2026.
Forward PE Ratio (N/A) = Close Price ($101.94) / Consensus Forward EPS ($2.44)
FORWARD PE RATIO
N/A
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.
Market Cap
$36.87B
Forward PE Ratio
N/A
| NAME | MARKET CAP | FORWARD PE RATIO |
|---|---|---|
| The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (EL) | $36.87B | N/A |
| Kenvue Inc. (KVUE)vs › | $36.60B | 16.26 |
| Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB)vs › | $36.28B | 14.67 |
| The Hershey Company (HSY)vs › | $37.82B | 21.95 |
| The Kroger Co. (KR)vs › | $35.47B | 12.06 |
| Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM)vs › | $38.70B | 15.34 |
| Sysco Corporation (SYY)vs › | $40.22B | 18.34 |
| The Kraft Heinz Company (KHC)vs › | $30.33B | 12.46 |
| Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. (KDP)vs › | $43.59B | 13.98 |
| Dollar General Corporation (DG)vs › | $27.22B | 18.76 |
Trailing P/E
203.9
reported TTM EPS
Forward P/E
N/A
consensus next-FY EPS
The gap between the two multiples is the consensus growth expectation: analysts' forward EPS of $2.44 implies +388.0% EPS growth vs the reported trailing $0.50.
At today's $101.94 close, each upcoming fiscal year's consensus EPS implies a different multiple — how quickly the price is "paid down" by expected earnings if the estimates hold.
PE Ratio = Share Price / Diluted EPS (TTM)
The price-to-earnings ratio measures how much investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings. A lower PE can indicate a cheaper valuation; a higher PE implies higher growth expectations.
Expanded definitions: Investopedia, Wikipedia, Corporate Finance Institute
| Fiscal year end |
|---|
| Consensus EPS |
|---|
| Estimate range |
|---|
| Analysts |
|---|
| Implied P/E |
|---|
| 2027-06-30 | $3.32 | $3.20 – $3.39 | 17 | 30.7x |
| 2028-06-30 | $3.94 | $3.74 – $4.29 | 15 | 25.9x |
| 2029-06-30 | $4.55 | $4.08 – $5.22 | 6 | 22.4x |
Source: FMP analyst consensus estimates, refreshed with the daily precompute. "n/m" = the consensus EPS is not positive, so a multiple is undefined. There is no forward P/E history chart here because charting one would require the estimates as they stood in the past, which we do not store — see the trailing P/E history for how the realized multiple has moved.
