Which has the lower trailing P/E, ADM or EL?

ADM has the lower trailing P/E: ADM trades at 22.56 and EL at 200.58. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, ADM or EL?

Over the past five years, ADM grew revenue faster — ADM at a 1.85% CAGR versus EL at -1.48%.

Does ADM or EL pay a bigger dividend?

ADM yields 2.39% and EL yields 1.44% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is ADM or EL more profitable?

ADM runs the higher net margin — ADM at 2.16% versus EL at 1.21%.

How have ADM and EL total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, ADM delivered 10.73% and EL delivered 2.34% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) vs The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (EL)

A side-by-side comparison of Archer-Daniels-Midland Company and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

ADM

Archer-Daniels-Midland Company

$39.68B

$82.34Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 22, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.

$36.27B

$100.29Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 22, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — ADM vs EL

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

ADM +176.2% (+10.7%/yr)EL +26.3% (+2.4%/yr)ADM compounded faster over this window

ADM EL

ADM vs EL: by the numbers

•ADM is the larger company ($39.68B vs $36.27B market cap).
•ADM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (22.56 vs 200.58 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•ADM converts more revenue to profit (2.16% vs 1.21% net margin).
•ADM grew revenue faster over the past five years (1.85% vs -1.48% CAGR).
•ADM pays the higher dividend yield (2.39% vs 1.44%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ADM	EL
P/E ratio	22.56	200.58
Forward P/E	15.33	N/A
P/S ratio	0.48	2.41
P/B ratio	1.68	9.53
EV / EBITDA	9.71	26.73
FCF yield	4.23%	3.63%

Profitability

Metric	ADM	EL
Gross margin	6.87%	75.50%
Operating margin	2.46%	5.18%
Net margin	2.16%	1.21%
ROE	7.51%	4.78%
ROIC	4.89%	2.97%

Dividends

Metric	ADM	EL
Dividend yield	2.39%	1.44%
Payout ratio	56.71%	280.00%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ADM	EL
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	1.85%	-1.48%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-6.73%	-42.44%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	58.63%	-15.16%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	10.78%	-20.75%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ADM or EL?: ADM has the lower trailing P/E: ADM trades at 22.56 and EL at 200.58. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, ADM or EL?: Over the past five years, ADM grew revenue faster — ADM at a 1.85% CAGR versus EL at -1.48%.
Does ADM or EL pay a bigger dividend?: ADM yields 2.39% and EL yields 1.44% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is ADM or EL more profitable?: ADM runs the higher net margin — ADM at 2.16% versus EL at 1.21%.
How have ADM and EL total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, ADM delivered 10.73% and EL delivered 2.34% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ADM analysis Full EL analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Archer-Daniels-Midl P/E ratio Estée Lauder Companies P/E ratio Archer-Daniels-Midl dividend yield Estée Lauder Companies dividend yield Archer-Daniels-Midl ROE Estée Lauder Companies ROE Archer-Daniels-Midl operating margin Estée Lauder Companies operating margin Archer-Daniels-Midl revenue growth Estée Lauder Companies revenue growth Archer-Daniels-Midl free cash flow Estée Lauder Companies free cash flow

Archer-Daniels-Midl & Estée Lauder Companies appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks 25+ Year Dividend Growers Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.