W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) vs Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company (WTW)
WRB and WTW are evenly matched — 7 metrics each of 14.
A side-by-side comparison of W. R. Berkley Corporation and Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
WRB
W. R. Berkley Corporation
$68.27Financial Services
WTW
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company
$262.63Financial Services
Total return — WRB vs WTW
growth of $100 · last 25yWRB +2577.3%WTW +497.3%WRB compounded faster
WRB WTW
WRB vs WTW: by the numbers
- •WRB is the larger company ($25.42B vs $24.80B market cap).
- •WRB trades at the lower earnings multiple (14.46 vs 15.32 P/E).
- •WTW converts more revenue to profit (16.84% vs 12.64% net margin).
- •WRB grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.95% vs 1.91% CAGR).
- •WRB pays the higher dividend yield (2.72% vs 1.42%).
Which is better, WRB or WTW?
Metric tally: WRB 7 · WTW 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueWRB(lower P/E)
GrowthWRB(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeWRB(higher dividend yield)
QualityWTW(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | WRB | WTW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 14.46● | 15.32 |
| Forward P/E | 14.58 | 13.44● |
| P/S ratio | 1.82● | 2.54 |
| P/B ratio | 2.77● | 3.15 |
| PEG ratio | 7.63 | 0.94● |
Profitability
| Metric | WRB | WTW |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 26.14% | 38.16%● |
| Operating margin | 16.24% | 22.73%● |
| Net margin | 12.64% | 16.84%● |
| ROE | 19.27% | 20.90%● |
| ROIC | 10.42% | 11.52%● |
Dividends
| Metric | WRB | WTW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.72%● | 1.42% |
| Payout ratio | 41.52% | 22.77% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | WRB | WTW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 11.95%● | 1.91% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 28.88%● | 16.30% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 17.46%● | 1.67% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, WRB or WTW?
- It depends on your goal. value: WRB (lower P/E); growth: WRB (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: WRB (higher dividend yield); quality: WTW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
- Is WRB or WTW cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, WRB is cheaper: WRB trades at a 14.46 P/E and WTW at 15.32.
- Which has grown faster, WRB or WTW?
- Over the past five years, WRB grew revenue faster — WRB at a 11.95% CAGR versus WTW at 1.91%.
- Does WRB or WTW pay a bigger dividend?
- WRB yields 2.72% and WTW yields 1.42% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is WRB or WTW more profitable?
- WTW runs the higher net margin — WRB at 12.64% versus WTW at 16.84%.
- Which has been the better investment, WRB or WTW?
- Over the past 10-year, WRB delivered the higher annualized total return — WRB at 17.34% versus WTW at 9.04%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
W. R. Berkley P/E ratioWillis Towers Watson Public P/E ratioW. R. Berkley dividend yieldWillis Towers Watson Public dividend yieldW. R. Berkley ROEWillis Towers Watson Public ROEW. R. Berkley operating marginWillis Towers Watson Public operating marginW. R. Berkley revenue growthWillis Towers Watson Public revenue growthW. R. Berkley free cash flowWillis Towers Watson Public free cash flow
W. R. Berkley & Willis Towers Watson Public appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.