Raymond James Financial, Inc. (RJF) vs Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company (WTW)
RJF leads on 7 of 12 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Raymond James Financial, Inc. and Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 21, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
RJF
Raymond James Financial, Inc.
$155.86Financial Services
WTW
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company
$255.20Financial Services
Total return — RJF vs WTW
growth of $100 · last 25yRJF +1701.8%WTW +480.4%RJF compounded faster
RJF WTW
RJF vs WTW: by the numbers
- •RJF is the larger company ($30.37B vs $24.10B market cap).
- •RJF trades at the lower earnings multiple (14.72 vs 14.89 P/E).
- •WTW converts more revenue to profit (16.84% vs 13.13% net margin).
- •RJF grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.83% vs 1.91% CAGR).
- •WTW pays the higher dividend yield (1.46% vs 1.33%).
Which is better, RJF or WTW?
Metric tally: RJF 7 · WTW 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthRJF(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeWTW(higher dividend yield)
QualityRJF(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | RJF | WTW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 14.72 | 14.89 |
| Forward P/E | 13.12 | 13.06 |
| P/S ratio | 1.90● | 2.47 |
| P/B ratio | 2.47● | 3.07 |
| PEG ratio | 2.76 | 0.91● |
Profitability
| Metric | RJF | WTW |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 89.16%● | 38.16% |
| Operating margin | 16.86% | 22.73%● |
| Net margin | 13.13% | 16.84%● |
| ROE | 17.08% | 20.90%● |
| ROIC | 15.88%● | 11.52% |
Dividends
| Metric | RJF | WTW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.33% | 1.46%● |
| Payout ratio | 19.75% | 22.77% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | RJF | WTW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 13.83%● | 1.91% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 21.61%● | 16.30% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 15.14%● | 3.84% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, RJF or WTW?
- It depends on your goal. growth: RJF (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: WTW (higher dividend yield); quality: RJF (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, RJF leads 7 to 5.
- Is RJF or WTW cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, RJF is cheaper: RJF trades at a 14.72 P/E and WTW at 14.89.
- Which has grown faster, RJF or WTW?
- Over the past five years, RJF grew revenue faster — RJF at a 13.83% CAGR versus WTW at 1.91%.
- Does RJF or WTW pay a bigger dividend?
- RJF yields 1.33% and WTW yields 1.46% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is RJF or WTW more profitable?
- WTW runs the higher net margin — RJF at 13.13% versus WTW at 16.84%.
- Which has been the better investment, RJF or WTW?
- Over the past 10-year, RJF delivered the higher annualized total return — RJF at 17.93% versus WTW at 8.87%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Raymond James Financial P/E ratioWillis Towers Watson Public P/E ratioRaymond James Financial dividend yieldWillis Towers Watson Public dividend yieldRaymond James Financial ROEWillis Towers Watson Public ROERaymond James Financial operating marginWillis Towers Watson Public operating marginRaymond James Financial revenue growthWillis Towers Watson Public revenue growthRaymond James Financial free cash flowWillis Towers Watson Public free cash flow
Raymond James Financial & Willis Towers Watson Public appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 21, 2026.