Which has the lower trailing P/E, PWP or SAFT?

SAFT has the lower trailing P/E: PWP trades at 52.93 and SAFT at 22.38. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, PWP or SAFT?

Over the past five years, SAFT grew revenue faster — PWP at a 7.67% CAGR versus SAFT at 11.08%.

Does PWP or SAFT pay a bigger dividend?

PWP yields 1.76% and SAFT yields 3.54% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is PWP or SAFT more profitable?

SAFT runs the higher net margin — PWP at 3.22% versus SAFT at 4.65%.

How have PWP and SAFT total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, PWP delivered 5.32% and SAFT delivered 10.23% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP) vs Safety Insurance Group, Inc. (SAFT)

A side-by-side comparison of Perella Weinberg Partners and Safety Insurance Group, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

PWP

Perella Weinberg Partners

$1.56B

$15.90Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 2:05 PM EDT

SAFT

Safety Insurance Group, Inc.

$1.52B

$103.85Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 2:05 PM EDT

Total return — PWP vs SAFT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y

PWP +79.0% (+10.2%/yr)SAFT +83.9% (+10.7%/yr)SAFT compounded faster over this window

PWP SAFT

PWP vs SAFT: by the numbers

•PWP is the larger company ($1.56B vs $1.52B market cap).
•SAFT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (22.38 vs 52.93 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•SAFT converts more revenue to profit (4.65% vs 3.22% net margin).
•SAFT grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.08% vs 7.67% CAGR).
•SAFT pays the higher dividend yield (3.54% vs 1.76%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	PWP	SAFT
P/E ratio	52.93	22.38
Forward P/E	17.28	25.03
P/S ratio	2.27	1.03
P/B ratio	N/A	1.74

Profitability

Metric	PWP	SAFT
Gross margin	97.23%	N/A
Operating margin	2.84%	5.94%
Net margin	3.22%	4.65%
ROE	N/A	7.83%

Safety Insurance Group, Inc.: Gross margin is not shown for a lender or insurer: its revenue is interest, premiums and fees rather than the sale of goods, so there is no cost of goods sold to measure it against.

Dividends

Metric	PWP	SAFT
Dividend yield	1.76%	3.54%
Payout ratio	93.21%	79.31%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	PWP	SAFT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	7.67%	11.08%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	-6.19%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	5.32%	10.23%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, PWP or SAFT?: SAFT has the lower trailing P/E: PWP trades at 52.93 and SAFT at 22.38. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, PWP or SAFT?: Over the past five years, SAFT grew revenue faster — PWP at a 7.67% CAGR versus SAFT at 11.08%.
Does PWP or SAFT pay a bigger dividend?: PWP yields 1.76% and SAFT yields 3.54% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is PWP or SAFT more profitable?: SAFT runs the higher net margin — PWP at 3.22% versus SAFT at 4.65%.
How have PWP and SAFT total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, PWP delivered 5.32% and SAFT delivered 10.23% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full PWP analysis Full SAFT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Perella Weinberg Partners P/E ratio Safety Insurance P/E ratio Perella Weinberg Partners dividend yield Safety Insurance dividend yield Perella Weinberg Partners ROE Safety Insurance ROE Perella Weinberg Partners operating margin Safety Insurance operating margin Perella Weinberg Partners revenue growth Safety Insurance revenue growth

Perella Weinberg Partners & Safety Insurance appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.