NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) vs The Procter & Gamble Company (PG)
A side-by-side comparison of NVIDIA Corporation and The Procter & Gamble Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: NVDA is classified in Technology; PG is classified in Consumer Defensive. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
$218.29TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
$145.27Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT
Total return — NVDA vs PG
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yNVDA +14460.2% (+64.6%/yr)PG +111.4% (+7.8%/yr)NVDA compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
NVDA PG
NVDA vs PG: by the numbers
- •NVDA is the larger company ($5.29T vs $345.34B market cap).
- •PG trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (21.94 vs 27.60 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •NVDA converts more revenue to profit (63.66% vs 18.44% net margin).
- •NVDA grew revenue faster over the past five years (69.34% vs 2.72% CAGR).
- •PG pays the higher dividend yield (3.01% vs 0.13%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | NVDA | PG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 27.60 | 21.94 |
| Forward P/E | 23.59 | 20.82 |
| P/S ratio | 17.45 | 3.97 |
| P/B ratio | 23.09 | 6.36 |
| EV / EBITDA | 26.35 | 16.17 |
| FCF yield | 2.40% | 4.61% |
Profitability
| Metric | NVDA | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 74.67% | 50.18% |
| Operating margin | 65.21% | 22.69% |
| Net margin | 63.66% | 18.44% |
| ROE | 84.23% | 29.54% |
| ROIC | 59.61% | 15.78% |
Dividends
| Metric | NVDA | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.13% | 3.01% |
| Payout ratio | 3.54% | 64.81% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | NVDA | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 69.34% | 2.72% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 94.31% | 3.48% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 82.12% | 0.42% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 57.72% | 2.41% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, NVDA or PG?
- PG has the lower trailing P/E: NVDA trades at 27.60 and PG at 21.94. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, NVDA or PG?
- Over the past five years, NVDA grew revenue faster — NVDA at a 69.34% CAGR versus PG at 2.72%.
- Does NVDA or PG pay a bigger dividend?
- NVDA yields 0.13% and PG yields 3.01% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is NVDA or PG more profitable?
- NVDA runs the higher net margin — NVDA at 63.66% versus PG at 18.44%.
- How have NVDA and PG total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, NVDA delivered 64.96% and PG delivered 8.07% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
NVIDIA P/E ratioProcter & Gamble P/E ratioNVIDIA dividend yieldProcter & Gamble dividend yieldNVIDIA ROEProcter & Gamble ROENVIDIA operating marginProcter & Gamble operating marginNVIDIA revenue growthProcter & Gamble revenue growthNVIDIA free cash flowProcter & Gamble free cash flow
NVIDIA & Procter & Gamble appear in these rankings
Highest Dividend Yield Stocks25+ Year Dividend GrowersFastest Revenue Growth StocksHighest ROE Stocks
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.