Is NVDA or PG cheaper?

On trailing earnings, PG is cheaper: NVDA trades at a 31.42 P/E and PG at 21.87.

Which has grown faster, NVDA or PG?

Over the past five years, NVDA grew revenue faster — NVDA at a 68.23% CAGR versus PG at 2.98%.

Does NVDA or PG pay a bigger dividend?

NVDA yields 0.01% and PG yields 2.85% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is NVDA or PG more profitable?

NVDA runs the higher net margin — NVDA at 62.97% versus PG at 19.22%.

Which has been the better investment, NVDA or PG?

Over the past 10-year, NVDA delivered the higher annualized total return — NVDA at 68.06% versus PG at 8.98%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) vs The Procter & Gamble Company (PG)

NVDA leads on 11 of 17 compared metrics, though PG is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of NVIDIA Corporation and The Procter & Gamble Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

The Procter & Gamble Company

$348.38B

$149.61Consumer Defensive

Total return — NVDA vs PG

growth of $100 · last 27y

NVDA +500157.2%PG +253.4%NVDA compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

NVDA PG

NVDA vs PG: by the numbers

•NVDA is the larger company ($4.97T vs $348.38B market cap).
•PG trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.87 vs 31.42 P/E).
•NVDA converts more revenue to profit (62.97% vs 19.22% net margin).
•NVDA grew revenue faster over the past five years (68.23% vs 2.98% CAGR).
•PG pays the higher dividend yield (2.85% vs 0.01%).

Which is better, NVDA or PG?

Metric tally: NVDA 11 · PG 6

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValuePG(lower P/E)

GrowthNVDA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomePG(higher dividend yield)

QualityNVDA(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	NVDA	PG
P/E ratio	31.42	21.87●
Forward P/E	16.44●	21.17
P/S ratio	19.74	4.17●
P/B ratio	25.60	6.63●
PEG ratio	0.57●	3.09
EV / EBITDA	25.96	16.03●
FCF yield	2.38%	4.16%●

Profitability

Metric	NVDA	PG
Gross margin	74.15%●	50.33%
Operating margin	64.02%●	23.24%
Net margin	62.97%●	19.22%
ROE	81.65%●	30.58%
ROIC	62.88%●	16.47%

Dividends

Metric	NVDA	PG
Dividend yield	0.01%	2.85%●
Payout ratio	0.61%	63.85%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	NVDA	PG
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	68.23%●	2.98%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	85.78%●	5.39%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	85.52%●	-1.64%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	63.05%●	4.73%

Frequently asked

Which is better, NVDA or PG?: It depends on your goal. value: PG (lower P/E); growth: NVDA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: PG (higher dividend yield); quality: NVDA (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NVDA leads 11 to 6.
Is NVDA or PG cheaper?: On trailing earnings, PG is cheaper: NVDA trades at a 31.42 P/E and PG at 21.87.
Which has grown faster, NVDA or PG?: Over the past five years, NVDA grew revenue faster — NVDA at a 68.23% CAGR versus PG at 2.98%.
Does NVDA or PG pay a bigger dividend?: NVDA yields 0.01% and PG yields 2.85% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is NVDA or PG more profitable?: NVDA runs the higher net margin — NVDA at 62.97% versus PG at 19.22%.
Which has been the better investment, NVDA or PG?: Over the past 10-year, NVDA delivered the higher annualized total return — NVDA at 68.06% versus PG at 8.98%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.