Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) vs NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)
NVDA leads on 10 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Merck & Co., Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — MRK vs NVDA
growth of $100 · last 27yMRK +79.6%NVDA +500157.2%NVDA compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
MRK NVDA
MRK vs NVDA: by the numbers
- •NVDA is the larger company ($4.97T vs $294.03B market cap).
- •NVDA trades at the lower earnings multiple (31.42 vs 33.54 P/E).
- •NVDA converts more revenue to profit (62.97% vs 13.62% net margin).
- •NVDA grew revenue faster over the past five years (68.23% vs 8.60% CAGR).
- •MRK pays the higher dividend yield (3.50% vs 0.01%).
Which is better, MRK or NVDA?
Metric tally: MRK 7 · NVDA 10It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueNVDA(lower P/E)
GrowthNVDA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeMRK(higher dividend yield)
QualityNVDA(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MRK | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 33.54 | 31.42● |
| Forward P/E | 12.35● | 16.44 |
| P/S ratio | 4.49● | 19.74 |
| P/B ratio | 6.41● | 25.60 |
| PEG ratio | 1.81 | 0.57● |
| EV / EBITDA | 19.58● | 25.96 |
| FCF yield | 4.80%● | 2.38% |
Profitability
| Metric | MRK | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 75.91%● | 74.15% |
| Operating margin | 27.59% | 64.02%● |
| Net margin | 13.62% | 62.97%● |
| ROE | 19.48% | 81.65%● |
| ROIC | 18.27% | 62.88%● |
Dividends
| Metric | MRK | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.50%● | 0.01% |
| Payout ratio | 57.12% | 0.61% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MRK | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.60% | 68.23%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 21.21% | 85.78%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 15.69% | 85.52%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 12.79% | 63.05%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MRK or NVDA?
- It depends on your goal. value: NVDA (lower P/E); growth: NVDA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MRK (higher dividend yield); quality: NVDA (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NVDA leads 10 to 7.
- Is MRK or NVDA cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, NVDA is cheaper: MRK trades at a 33.54 P/E and NVDA at 31.42.
- Which has grown faster, MRK or NVDA?
- Over the past five years, NVDA grew revenue faster — MRK at a 8.60% CAGR versus NVDA at 68.23%.
- Does MRK or NVDA pay a bigger dividend?
- MRK yields 3.50% and NVDA yields 0.01% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is MRK or NVDA more profitable?
- NVDA runs the higher net margin — MRK at 13.62% versus NVDA at 62.97%.
- Which has been the better investment, MRK or NVDA?
- Over the past 10-year, NVDA delivered the higher annualized total return — MRK at 11.57% versus NVDA at 68.06%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Merck & P/E ratioNVIDIA P/E ratioMerck & dividend yieldNVIDIA dividend yieldMerck & ROENVIDIA ROEMerck & operating marginNVIDIA operating marginMerck & revenue growthNVIDIA revenue growthMerck & free cash flowNVIDIA free cash flow
Merck & & NVIDIA appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.